G4MX 440 vs. g3 ti-200 which one and why?

[spaceman]

im pretty well set on getting one of these cards.
Which one is faster?
Which one has better 2D?
btw this is my 2000th post!

 

[jcmkk]

Do a search, there were like 5 different post about this same comparison last night alone.

 

[Mavrick007]

Personally I wouldn't purchase any of the GF4 MX versions at all. They are really just crippled GF2's with a bit better performance in some things than the GF2.
If you are comparing the GF4 MX to the GF3 TI200, I would go for the GF3 TI200 cause they have the same features as the GF4 (directX8, Pixel shaders, etc).

Go with the GF3 Ti200, you will be glad you did when comparing to any of the MX's, but if it's the GF4 TI, I would go for the TI4200 when it comes out. It's a good price point and it should be very fast compared to anything in the GF3 or lower range.

 

[johndoe52]

gf3 ti200. Has support for some features that the g4mx 440 doesn't.

 

[erikiksaz]

Read up on what Carmack had to say about the G4mx.

 

[Athlon4all]

Ti200. It is faster than the MX440 and is future proof (ie is a fully DX8 part).

 

[mithrandir2001]

No self-respecting hardware enthusiast should purchase a GF4 MX part...it's deplorable labelling by nVidia. There are better alternatives at the same price points (e.g. GF3 Ti series, Radeon).

 

[spaceman]

I already read what Carmack had to say, however DOOM 3 afaik isnt even on the radar map.I will buy a fitting card for it when a test/demo/release date is in sight.

I wassold on the gf3 and generally thought it was a faster card, but these benches seem pretty impressive for the 440Benches


it seems to be faster than the ti200 in some things at least.