FYI almost everyone will see a tax increase.

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
The payroll tax cut that is around 3% total has expired. It has not been renewed and affects nearly everyone. So the majority of Americans will see tax increase, and substantial one at that.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
The payroll tax cut that is around 3% total has expired. It has not been renewed and affects nearly everyone. So the majority of Americans will see tax increase, and substantial one at that.

Only 77% of Americans, an average of $700/year for the average working stiff. Maybe a bit more for the well-off considering payroll taxes phase out at a bit over $100k. Well worth the price considering Obama got his desired tax increase on the 2%. And don't forget the $200B plus in subsidies to big business.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
The payroll tax cut that is around 3% total has expired. It has not been renewed and affects nearly everyone. So the majority of Americans will see tax increase, and substantial one at that.

Fine by me, they never should have cut it to begin with
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
This sucks, and my pay check will be lower, as soon as next period.

-John {fighting the gawdzillion dollar deficit, with more taxes, while Government spends more.}
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Fine by me, they never should have cut it to begin with

Sounds good to me also. The Democrat plan means the average U.S. household that earns $50,000, will pay an extra $1,000 in taxes in 2013. For an individual earning the maximum 2013 cap of $113,700 or more, the increase would be $2,274, or nearly $200 per month. Regressive taxes FTW.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,541
1,106
126
Sounds good to me also. The Democrat plan means the average U.S. household that earns $50,000, will pay an extra $1,000 in taxes in 2013. For an individual earning the maximum 2013 cap of $113,700 or more, the increase would be $2,274, or nearly $200 per month. Regressive taxes FTW.

The cap should be completely removed. Solves 95% of the problems with social security.

And making the temporary payroll tax reduction permanent would have only made the problems with SS and Medicare many many times worse that they already are.
 
Last edited:

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
The cap should be completely removed. Solves 95% of the problems with social security.

And making the temporary payroll tax reduction permanent would have only made the problems with SS and Medicare many times worse.

Yup
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
The cap should be completely removed. Solves 95% of the problems with social security.

Why do that when we can reduce tax credits that help the working poor instead, like the The Child and Dependent Care Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit? Both are getting greatly slashed next year.

Face it, if you're a progressive Democrat, you got rolled with this bill. Hell, you couldn't even hold the line on increasing taxes for $250k and above, yet caved on big tax increases for lower income earners.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
I don't think our friendly liberals here on P&N had any idea that a $25,000 wage earner was going to pay more taxes.

They rarely think about wage earners, except on how to tax them more.

-John
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
Knew it was going to happen. Neither side even proposed extending it or talked about it. It's one of the reasons I "cut the cord" and ditched my cable a few months ago. It was almost exactly the same monthly cost as the tax hike will be.
 

SparkyJJO

Lifer
May 16, 2002
13,357
7
81
Isn't that lovely. I knew it was coming sooner or later. Then add on the obamacare cost insanity and I'll be lucky to not go broke and still have a job. We're still not sure what the effects of that crap will be on the budget at work yet, but it isn't looking pretty.

Now when will they finally cut spending to reasonable levels like the rest of us have to do? Or is some basic math far too much to ask of washington? :rolleyes:
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
Why do that when we can reduce tax credits that help the working poor instead, like the The Child and Dependent Care Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit? Both are getting greatly slashed next year.

Face it, if you're a progressive Democrat, you got rolled with this bill. Hell, you couldn't even hold the line on increasing taxes for $250k and above, yet caved on big tax increases for lower income earners.

i think the 450k line that got drawn in the end is more realistic, espcially with the way they're going to handle LTCG now it looks like..... 250 was a bit low... and the marriage tax is getting heavy!
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,635
2,897
136
Eh, I never got the tax cut in the first place (I don't pay the payroll tax) so no biggie. On the downside, my wife will now have to pay the entire ~15%.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Per boldprogressives.org, 98 percent of Americans will actually see a larger tax increase than some of the richest Americans.


richcuts.jpg
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
I can only imagine Obama stomping around his bedroom. "They're going to crucify me next paycheck!"

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
He is the problem. Obama represents Government, and Government is the problem.

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
The obvious solution, is smaller Government, less Government spending, and fewer taxes.

-John