• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

fx5200 vs. ti200

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Mingon
As for lacklustre features you are talking rubbish, their is no card which supports directx9 in the price range >.< This will lead programmers to code for dx9 nowing full well that it is available for the lowest common denominator.
Tomb Raider: AoD seems to be one of the first games with DX9 shaders. The game defaults to DX8 with a 5200. You do the math.
 
5200 is retarded. People should do some reading before they buy cards. However I do think NVidia is a sneaky piece of crap for the way the lable their products.
 
Originally posted by: Johnbear007
5200 is retarded. People should do some reading before they buy cards. However I do think NVidia is a sneaky piece of crap for the way the lable their products.

but ati isnt? the 9200??? gimme a break
rolleye.gif
 
What I think is worse is the ati intergrated graphics chipset called the 9100, is it an intergrated 9100 hell no, its half a 9200.
 
Back
Top