• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

FX-53 or 4000+

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Alot of recent games support widescreen modes, and the player can actually see more information (as opposed to strecthing the image) as a result of the greater viewing area. It does provide a distinct advantage (greater peripheral vision) in FPS games. So buying a widescreen CRT or LCD would acutally be a good idea.
 
😱 now i am getting confused!!!!

lol

(i just want a big azz'd screen (crt since LCD's cost way to much atm) like a 20+)

so i can see someone else in fps games (trust me i need all the advantage i can get!!)

thanks
 
I think he needs to see the CPU chart.

http://www.c627627.com/AMD/Athlon64/

The FX55 runs at a stock speed of 2.6 or 2600.
The FX53 and 4000+ run at a stock speed of 2.4 or 2400

Now, many will tell you to buy a lower end chip, like a 3200+ and OC it up to a 4000+ level. Yes, that can be done. But at the same time, if you start off with an FX53 or FX55, your OC potential is much greater right out of the box. And since you said you don't want to OC that much to start, paying the extra money and getting a 4000+ or FX55 is well worth the money. You will be at a very high level to start, and then you can OC a little bit once you learn.
 
Back
Top