Fvck movie critics ... Fantasic Four was a good summer movie

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,614
6,488
126
screw what you are hearing all these critics saying. I saw it last night w/my GF and we both enjoyed it greatly, as did everyone in the sold out theatre. the movie does not suck at all. the acting is decent for a summer action flick, and the effects are really nice as well.

i heard critics complaining about how they go into detail of where the thing's one liner comes from ... it was like a 5 second clip. i don't know why critics have to overanalyze EVERY freaking movie, then we see movies like Lost in Translation, or CHicago up for academy awards.

if you like movies like Spiderman then you will like this movie. The acting in this isn't any worse than the baby toby mcguire in Spiderman. its definitely worth watching in the theatre too because of the sound and effects.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,614
6,488
126
Originally posted by: LoKe
I've never been with the critics on any movie, they seem so out of touch with what is entertaining.

ditto. i don't think they have liked a movie since the 20th century.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Summer movies aren't about deep plots and Oscar winning performances. They're about high speed car chases, blowing sh!t up, and high dollar FX. A super hero movie fills that niche well.
 

Mucho

Guest
Oct 20, 2001
8,231
2
0
Originally posted by: LoKe
I've never been with the critics on any movie, they seem so out of touch with what is entertaining.

Thats probably because they are all adults.
 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: LoKe
I've never been with the critics on any movie, they seem so out of touch with what is entertaining.

ditto. i don't think they have liked a movie since the 20th century.
Uh they liked Batman Begins, Episode 3 and War of the Worlds so I'm getting the impression that you have no clue what you are talking about.
 

bradruth

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
13,479
2
81
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Summer movies aren't about deep plots and Oscar winning performances. They're about high speed car chases, blowing sh!t up, and high dollar FX. A super hero movie fills that niche well.

Exactly.


Good summer movie = good movie.
 
Aug 27, 2002
10,043
2
0
Originally posted by: LoKe
I've never been with the critics on any movie, they seem so out of touch with what is entertaining.

Mr. Movie Phone is pretty accurate on most movies. (although he isn't a huge critic as far as hollywood is concerned.)
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
F4 is a turd. Trust me on this. People all over the US are giving it a big "WTF HAPPENED??!!! THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN GOOD!!!!" right now.
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
F4 looked bad, was bad, and still will always be bad....

i loved rottentomatoes review..it was dead on...plus there is hotter girls than JA folks
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
So what was The incredibles.....a fluke?

Some movies are jsut sh!t with tig ole' bitties and extrostions.


Deal with it.
 

Dubb

Platinum Member
Mar 25, 2003
2,495
0
0
Oh come on, it wasn't even a good action movie.

1.) alba is still a terrible actress. better than sin city but still awful
2.) the FX were terrible, with the exception of the thing. every CG shot was WAY below par for today's movies.
3.) Reid and doom didn't establish anything. pure cheese from both of them. even in a dumb action movie, you have to care enough that you actually want one of them to win.
4.) the script spent way too much time on boring crap and flew by the few parts that were interesting.

I love a good action movie as much as the next guy, but this one stunk.
 

surreal1221

Golden Member
Mar 12, 2005
1,206
0
0
Originally posted by: purbeast0
screw what you are hearing all these critics saying. I saw it last night w/my GF and we both enjoyed it greatly, as did everyone in the sold out theatre. the movie does not suck at all. the acting is decent for a summer action flick, and the effects are really nice as well.

i heard critics complaining about how they go into detail of where the thing's one liner comes from ... it was like a 5 second clip. i don't know why critics have to overanalyze EVERY freaking movie, then we see movies like Lost in Translation, or CHicago up for academy awards.

if you like movies like Spiderman then you will like this movie. The acting in this isn't any worse than the baby toby mcguire in Spiderman. its definitely worth watching in the theatre too because of the sound and effects.

bs! When more than 80% of the critics say it sucks, or didnt perform. . . it must have really sucked.

 

RadioHead84

Platinum Member
Jan 8, 2004
2,166
0
0
Eh the plot was pretty thin but i thought the action was fun.

Like other says..good summer flick

My friends that are hardcore comic people seemed to like it...

Their comic movie ratings go like this usually..

Spiderman
Batman
Xmen


While mine go

Batman
Xmen
Spiderman
 

GonzoCircus

Senior member
Jan 31, 2004
665
0
0
rotten tomatoes is, for the mostpart, on point. most movies that get released aren't good. some people have low standards and can appreciate crap. they pay to see crap so hollywood makes it. if raise your bar, hollywood will have to raise its bar.

i will not be seeing this movie.
 

ZaneNBK

Golden Member
Sep 14, 2000
1,674
0
76
Originally posted by: Dubb
Oh come on, it wasn't even a good action movie.

1.) alba is still a terrible actress. better than sin city but still awful
2.) the FX were terrible, with the exception of the thing. every CG shot was WAY below par for today's movies.
3.) Reid and doom didn't establish anything. pure cheese from both of them. even in a dumb action movie, you have to care enough that you actually want one of them to win.
4.) the script spent way too much time on boring crap and flew by the few parts that were interesting.

I love a good action movie as much as the next guy, but this one stunk.

I'm pretty sure there wasn't much, if any, CG for the thing. That was a rubber suit. At one point you could even see the rubber bulging obviously when he bent down to pick something up during the first suicide/rescue scene.
 

Pepsei

Lifer
Dec 14, 2001
12,895
1
0
Lost in Translation was good with hotter girl in her panties, F4 sucked so bad.
 

Dubb

Platinum Member
Mar 25, 2003
2,495
0
0
Originally posted by: ZaneNBK
Originally posted by: Dubb
Oh come on, it wasn't even a good action movie.

1.) alba is still a terrible actress. better than sin city but still awful
2.) the FX were terrible, with the exception of the thing. every CG shot was WAY below par for today's movies.
3.) Reid and doom didn't establish anything. pure cheese from both of them. even in a dumb action movie, you have to care enough that you actually want one of them to win.
4.) the script spent way too much time on boring crap and flew by the few parts that were interesting.

I love a good action movie as much as the next guy, but this one stunk.

I'm pretty sure there wasn't much, if any, CG for the thing. That was a rubber suit. At one point you could even see the rubber bulging obviously when he bent down to pick something up during the first suicide/rescue scene.

...hence why I said "the FX were terrible, with the exception of the thing."

rubber suit is FX too, just not cg. I was saying all the CG stuff was crap by today's standards.
 

RagingBITCH

Lifer
Sep 27, 2003
17,618
2
76
Originally posted by: Dubb
Originally posted by: ZaneNBK
Originally posted by: Dubb
Oh come on, it wasn't even a good action movie.

1.) alba is still a terrible actress. better than sin city but still awful
2.) the FX were terrible, with the exception of the thing. every CG shot was WAY below par for today's movies.
3.) Reid and doom didn't establish anything. pure cheese from both of them. even in a dumb action movie, you have to care enough that you actually want one of them to win.
4.) the script spent way too much time on boring crap and flew by the few parts that were interesting.

I love a good action movie as much as the next guy, but this one stunk.

I'm pretty sure there wasn't much, if any, CG for the thing. That was a rubber suit. At one point you could even see the rubber bulging obviously when he bent down to pick something up during the first suicide/rescue scene.

...hence why I said "the FX were terrible, with the exception of the thing."

rubber suit is FX too, just not cg. I was saying all the CG stuff was crap by today's standards.

Dubb is right - that movie is fvcking horrific.
 

jjzelinski

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2004
3,750
0
0
I think it boils down to this; if you actualyl sat through ID4, or The ROck, or BAttlefield Earth, or any other Bruckheimer/Bay cinematic abortion you'll proabbly like this movie too.
 

RagingBITCH

Lifer
Sep 27, 2003
17,618
2
76
Originally posted by: jjzelinski
I think it boils down to this; if you actualyl sat through ID4, or The ROck, or BAttlefield Earth, or any other Bruckheimer/Bay cinematic abortion you'll proabbly like this movie too.

The Rock was bad ass. Criterion Collection. Don't label it in the same category as Battlefield Earth or any other sh!t movie.