Further potential for falsification of reality

[WHAMPOM]

Does that mean that unprotected video is inadmissible in court, as it could be tampered with? What about civilian videos of law enforcement wrongdoing? Will the 'new standard' for video evidence hinge on specific (licensed) file formats, or camera types, which prevent tampering to a reasonable degree?

Chain of custody of the original recording media that came out of the camera or true to "original" copies of that recording. Pretty much the evidence rules in effect now.