- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
I realize this wasn't supposed to be a deep philisophical question, but it really does show more about your mind than you may have thought.
I'm OK with that, like I said you didn't get this thread, that's OK.
I realize this wasn't supposed to be a deep philisophical question, but it really does show more about your mind than you may have thought.
It does give you those possibilities but it doesn't guarantee it, option 1 guarantees fun.
True, I'd take my chances on the money enabling me to do all the fun things and enjoy a constantly fun life (though not guaranteed, a high possibility), plus having the money to facilitate goals, achievements or specific desires to give your life more purpose. Like having substance in addition to the dessert.
It could be anything from funding political aspirations to investing to make a fortune, buying a sports team, on and on... things that you wouldn't get with just the guaranteed fun life.
The money option is close to having your cake and eating it too.
But there are some things that you find fun that don't require money.
I'm saying that you will be given the thing not the money, I.e. if you enjoy skydiving you get to do it without paying, no need for money, free fun.
this thread is retarded.
...climb aboard a Soviet rocket, and hang out with the astronauts on the International Space Station...
/tosh"Money doesn't buy happiness." Uh, do you live in America? 'Cause it buys a WaveRunner. Have you ever seen a sad person on a WaveRunner? Have you? Seriously, have you? Try to frown on a WaveRunner. You can't!
