"TSMC claim that actually the 40nm process that is being used for the Cypress family is routinely achieving yields in the 60% to 80% range, which is actually confirmed by the fact that ATI is keeping product in the pipeline and you can actually buy boards at retail."
How does being for sale in retail confirm such high yields? Yields could be shit but some boards might still pop up in retail, if ATI only orders enough wafers![]()
Had nothing to do with CES - it was from a single forum post on a gaming board, made by some very childish-behaving guy with some Indian name, claiming to be an ex-NV employee...
...most likely utter BS.
I'd love to find a nice long and detailed article on how it came to this. Maybe some months down the road post-launch.
Where is he anyway? I was wondering this earlier. :hmm:You don't need along drawn out article for that . NV took a big step with a big chip and its a natural thing that it would be late with low yields . They will straighten it out.
But how it came to this is simple enough NV marketeers spreading Hype to stop 5000 series sales . Its really that simple . If IDC were here posting he could explain it better than any . But alas IDF is gone now . With a New Job but he not far away are you IDC?
Where is he anyway? I was wondering this earlier. :hmm:
Just fud working for his sponsors. Nvidia has a very nice card coming and lowering expectations is just part of the game.
Those in the known are claiming that Fermi despite the yield and thermal issues is only about 20% faster than Cypress, while Hemlock smokes it.
I subscribe to the "don't believe everything you read" mentality, but for pete's sake do you think everything written about Nvidia, bad or good, is a lie?
So now you wish to start the ball rolling on a new line of thinking. Nvidia has a monster, but they paid FUD to downplay it, lowering the competitions guard. amiright?
Wow.
Wow! All I said was Nvidia has a very nice card, not a "monster". Yes I would describe the 5850 as very nice also. Price and personal needs tend to rule.
This is a little rich after the many Nvidia pr suggestions that Charlie is a paid AMD shill with a personal grudge. Just turns out that my respect for fud is not that high either.
All companies like to keep expectations reasonable. After that very impressive demo at CES, expectations were getting silly.
Not happy about the personal attack suggesting I like to get balls rolling....
Okaaaaaaaayyyyyyyy then. I'm going to go laugh myself to sleep now.
Its not for me to say . It just adds to the mystery of Nemesis 1
When someone says 20% faster what does that really mean?
If this 20% is based on tested frame rates I think we can throw this idea of Fermi being a bad chip out the window.
Give a higher powered GPU extra resolution and the performance gap will widen.
Just fud working for his sponsors. Nvidia has a very nice card coming and lowering expectations is just part of the game.
I don't know that Nvidia would want to lower expectations. I would think that doing so right now would push potential customers to a 58xx card. Think about it, if Nvidia was to release a some less than flattering information about Fermi then why would someone looking for a high end gaming card wait when they can buy a 58xx now? Anything is possible, I just don't know what purpose it would server I guess.
Lol Nemesis you crack me up![]()
NV still has the goold old 8800/9800/250/(and dare I predict it, 340?) to carry them through 2010. Crank up the marketing machine, get the viral guys to yammer incessantly about PhysX & 3d glasses and everything should turn out well even without enthusiast parts.
To listen to Wreckage, nv is dominating the market even without any competitive products. Who knows, that may continue for yet another year.
Still can't get the 5970 anywhere and prices are still too far above MSRP![]()
