1. Google isn't so big on software
Google's real plan with Android is to dominate the mobile advertising space. It fully realizes that the best way to achieve that goal is by doing whatever it can to capitalize on the desire for touch-screen smartphones with the help of Android. That's precisely why Google offers its operating system for free. But despite this focus on mobile-advertising dominance, Google falls short compared with Apple on software design.
2. Apple understands consumers
Apple understands what consumers want and how they will use a particular product. That comes through in all the products the company sells, including its iOS platform. Google, on the other hand, doesn't seem to understand consumers as well as it could. It's certainly doing a better job than most companies, but it still has a long way to go to match Apple. In fact, Google's consumer understanding seems to be more Microsoft-like than Apple-like. And that could be a problemespecially for its operating systemdown the line.
3. Multitasking
Multitasking on iOS is a key reason why Apple has enjoyed such success in the mobile market. For years, consumers were hoping for true multitasking; for years, the company made no promises. But in iOS 4, multitasking is running on the iPhone. Because of that, Google has a long way to go to match anything Apple is currently offering.
Are you serious? Apple is late the party with multi-tasking, and even half-assed it in iOS4. WinMo, WebOS, and Android have all had true multi-tasking for a long time. People griped about this distinct shortcoming on early version of iPhone OS.
4. Folders make it all OK
Apple's iOS platform is better than Android 2.2 for several major reasons. But one of the minor things that consumers should think about is Apple's operating system's folder support. With little effort, consumers can quickly create folders, lump similar programs together, and more. It provides a rewarding experience. And it's a concept that Google has to play catch-up with. Another load of crap from eWeek. Again, Apple was late to the game on this pretty obvious feature.
5. Ease of use must come into play
In any evaluation between two operating systems, ease of use must play a role. After all, if a particular operating system is easier to use for the average consumer than is another, it should get the nod. In this case, iOS 4 easily gets the nodApple's operating system is simply easier to use. What's more, it doesn't suffer from the strange quirks that arise on Android due to vendors trying to tailor the user experience to their own products.
While Android is pretty easy to use, there's definitely an issue with every vendor trying to customize it and load it up with their own crud.
6. Responsiveness
One of the main issues with Android 2.2 is that the software doesn't respond as effectively as it should when compared with iOS. Does that mean there is a responsiveness issue with Android 2.2? Absolutely not. In fact, compared with other operating systems, it holds up quite well. But Apple's platform is different. It's just that iOS simply provides more responsiveness when users interact with it. It could be extremely difficult for Google match that any time soon.
Baloney. Yes, Froyo will struggle when paired with entry level hardware, the cheaper, low end smart phones. Pair Android with even antiquated OMAP3430s in the D1 and Android runs like a champ. As SoC design moves forward, this be even less of a non issue.
7. Too many variations
Because Android is an open platform, vendors that get their hands on the operating system can change it however they see fit. That openness creates an environment across the Android ecosystem that loses uniformity and provides variations of the Android operating system on different phones. The result is sometimes spotty performance that must be taken into account when evaluating differences between iOS and Android.
This argument always makes me laugh. Since when did having a choice come to mean a bad thing? With Android, you have a plethora of options, large screens, small screens, keyboards, no keyboards, etc. This may come as a shock, but not everyone wants their Model T in black.
8. Apple's App Store
Apple's App Store is integral to the success of iOS 4. With hundreds of thousands of applications, Apple's marketplace is the best place to find programs that appeal to both consumers and enterprise customers. Admittedly, Google's Android Market has been growing at a rapid rate, but it has a long way to go to match Apple's store.
Android Market has 100,000 apps in it now, easily rivaling Apple's product. No idea how I'll sleep at night though, without my 75,000 fart apps.
9. iTunes integration
Whenever users pick up an iOS-based device, they can access iTunes from the product. That's extremely important. It provides them with an end-to-end entertainment experience that isn't so readily available on Android. After all, iTunes is the world's top music store. If only Apple's products have direct access to it, few could make the case that Google's offering can best Apple's.
iTunes? AmazonMP3, problem solved.
10. The tablet issue
Google has said that Android 2.2 is not designed for tablets. Apple doesn't have that issue with iOS 4. Currently, iOS 3 is running on the iPad. But this month, Apple plans to offer iOS 4 integration with its tablet. When that happens, the company will prove that its operating system is the best choice for just about anyone trying to go mobile. Then the onus will be on Google to respond.
I realize this is an article about Froyo only, but Gingerbread will bring tablet optimizations. There's also several implementations of Froyo on tablets which have been decent.
Facebook
Twitter