• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Friend just got slapped with a lawsuit from Time Warner

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: illustri
wait, why would time warner the isp care about downloading movies? why is the suit from them instead of mpaa?

Time Warner is not just an ISP, IIRC.You know, the whole AOL-Time Warner thing.

yea but they don't make movies
 
Originally posted by: illustri
wait, why would time warner the isp care about downloading movies? why is the suit from them instead of mpaa?
time warner is involved in many movies.

 
Seems fishy to me. Up until this thread, Ive never heard by a Pirate getting slapped with a lawsuit by anyone but the MPAA/RIAA.

Zerofill the drive, trash it. Get a new one. Reinstall OS. Call bluff.
 
Originally posted by: TheNinja
Originally posted by: GoodDad
Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: GoodDad
how can they prove that he dl'd it?

ISP's keep logs

pirate boy is going to be poor

no way that will stand up in court. His neighbor must have hacked into his wireless network and dl'd it.

I agree. I just don't see how they have proof that it was actually him. Just erase the movie from the HDD, heck do a low level format of the thing. All other evidence in circumstantial. For all he knows, some guy snuck into his house and downloaded Harry Potter, then burned in on a DVD.....that bastard! I hate when people sneak into my house to use my computer.

I used the key under the flower pot.
 
i stand corrected:

The following enterprises are part of Time Warner:

Warner Bros., a movie studio
New Line Cinema, a movie studio
 
you guys don't get it

they don't have to prove anything

a middle class family is going to have a dent in their budget to hire a lawyer to defend against this

it will be easier/cheaper to settle than to fight it, so the pirate boy's family is going to be out 5-10% of their annual income because of this
 
The solution is simple:

tell them that he was downloading what he thought was Harry Potter, but turned out to be a pron movie.

everyone wins. 😉
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
you guys don't get it

they don't have to prove anything

a middle class family is going to have a dent in their budget to hire a lawyer to defend against this

it will be easier/cheaper to settle than to fight it, so the pirate boy's family is going to be out 5-10% of their annual income because of this

The sad truth is that AOL/Time/Warner could probably just pick a national ISP - MSN or something - get their client list and sue every one of them, offering to settle, whether the 'victim' even knew what a filesharing program WAS or not.

Who can fight a mega-corporation?
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
you guys don't get it

they don't have to prove anything

a middle class family is going to have a dent in their budget to hire a lawyer to defend against this

it will be easier/cheaper to settle than to fight it, so the pirate boy's family is going to be out 5-10% of their annual income because of this

Agreed. They wouldn't be filing a lawsuit unless they had the ammo to back it up.
 
Originally posted by: Siva
Wow, that really sucks. Its like $5 to rent a movie, isn't $4k kinda overkill?

exactly. I'm also very perplexed about why time warner charged such a high price for dl-ing a $10 movie.
 
time warner owns a crapload of stuff. even tv shows on other networks such as Joey on NBC are ultimately done by Time Warner.
i only know this as I work for a small company owned by WB.
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
you guys don't get it

they don't have to prove anything

a middle class family is going to have a dent in their budget to hire a lawyer to defend against this

it will be easier/cheaper to settle than to fight it, so the pirate boy's family is going to be out 5-10% of their annual income because of this
I guess that's the price we pay for the society we live in, but it just seems fscking wrong for a multi billion dollar corporation to even care about 4k, let alone stiff a working-class family out of 5-10% of their annual income, as you say..... just seems wrong...

 
Why are they slapping him with a lawsuit after such a long drought? My bet is the guy was using BT and that they're busting him for sharing (uploading) instead of downloading.
 
Originally posted by: russianpower
Originally posted by: Siva
Wow, that really sucks. Its like $5 to rent a movie, isn't $4k kinda overkill?

exactly. I'm also very perplexed about why time warner charged such a high price for dl-ing a $10 movie.
walk into best buy. Steal a Britney Spears CD. Get caught. If first time, maybe get away with a slap on the wrist. Pay for CD, maybe a small fee. Mostly just embarassment.

Download same CD, get sued by Britney for $10k per crappy song

 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: FoBoT
you guys don't get it

they don't have to prove anything

a middle class family is going to have a dent in their budget to hire a lawyer to defend against this

it will be easier/cheaper to settle than to fight it, so the pirate boy's family is going to be out 5-10% of their annual income because of this
I guess that's the price we pay for the society we live in, but it just seems fscking wrong for a multi billion dollar corporation to even care about 4k, let alone stiff a working-class family out of 5-10% of their annual income, as you say..... just seems wrong...

I would imagine they are just trying to make an example out of him.
 
Back
Top