Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Sluggo
Originally posted by: Ronstang
I'm not trying to be cruel but you already know the answer to your question and that is to have the poor fellow euthanized. It is the best option. Who is going to adopt a cat that need $2K worth of surgery? It is unlikely to happen.
WTH? If the cat is happy and mobile, there is absolutely no reason to have it put down. Like a cat cant live out a life with a slight limp.
Ah, the liberal who thinks he is merciful yet is acutally the cruel one. You think it is OK to have a cat with a broken leg and to just let it be? If you cannot or will not pay to have it corrected then have the decency to do the proper and humane thing and have the animal put down. I am an animal person so I do not take these things lightly. Any repsectable Vet would tell you exactly what I am.
Not a liberal at all thank you.
The cat does not have a broken leg, the cat has had a broken leg, that didnt heal exactly properly. The leg is only, from the way I read the OP, slightly mis-shapen causing a cat to walk with a slight limp. The cat apparently runs and shows no outward signs of pain or discomfort. Surgery would correct this so you would have a perfect textbook kitten, but I would imagine in the history of mankind, more than 1 or 2 domestic animals have lived with a slight limp.
My wife and I had a dog who lived for 14 years, quite happy and carefree, with hip dysplasia. The vet pretty much said it was operable, but may leave the dog completely paralyzed. The vet also said that the dog could live a fine life unless the pain was too much, which in his last few months it was and we did finally have him put down.