• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Fresh From the Press.

JackMDS

Elite Member
Super Moderator
If I was in the market for Pre N MIMO I would hold my "Horses" for few weeks.

The JP will spend the next two days finalizing the EWC's 802.11n proposal. If all goes as planned, presentation will formally be made to the Task Group N at its meeting next week in Hawaii. It is part of the overall 802.11 Working Group's bi-monthly gathering.

Quote from, http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/news/article.php/3577171

:sun:
 
so is it done yet or they are probably signing it?

I haven't kept up with it. what are the big changes? frequency? mutliplexing? speeds? layer1/2 stuff?
 
The Joint Proposal (JP) team in the IEEE 802.11n Enhanced Wireless Consortium (EWC) proposal.

So hopefully it will be finalized and there after signed after the Hawaii meting.:beer:

:sun:
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
I asked other questions.

Feed me.
😉
Key Features of TGn Sync Proposal

MIMO Spatial Division Multiplexing to support 315Mbps reliably with two antennas, up to 630Mbps with larger systems

Scalable Architecture for different spatial stream (2 to 4) and spectrum configurations (10, 20, 40 MHz)

Seamless Interoperability between 802.11a/b/g and new modes of operation

Timed Receive Mode Switching and Multiple Receiver Addressing to reduce power for battery-operated devices

Flexible architecture offering product compliance for all major regulatory domains while preserving interoperability.

:sun:
 
Thanks Jack.

Sounds pretty good. REAL good actually.

Sounds like they shot for the moon. Hope it goes well. Then again IEEE gets their stuff down pat. They lead, I just follow.

Now if I can only be reassured of upgradable radios to support this I'll be OK, if not radically change my standard.
 
Back
Top