Opinion | The Dangerous Appeal of Neil Young’s Righteous Censorship
Joe Rogan’s all wrong on Covid vaccines, but nothing good comes from stifling free speech.
www.politico.com
In this piece, as I read it we hear an appeal to free speech and a critique of Young as attempting to silence it. It raises the most difficult issue there is in politics and moral thinking generally, also in my opinion. I am of the belief that freedom of speech is one of the most threatened rights our liberal Forefathers established constitutionally and one of the first things to come under attack on the left and the right. Such attacks I believe are profoundly dangerous. On the other hand the unadulterated spread of dangerous misinformation in the hands of the mad is also a mortal threat and how to balance these two facts is challenging.
In the article Young is criticized for trying to silence Rogan and various points are made defending that position. I found the article to be essentially bull shit for reasons the article mentioned in the very first paragraph:
"The great uprising against comedian Joe Rogan led by a small posse of over-the-hill rockers has ended in surrender before it really got started. Rogan, whose Joe Rogan Experience podcast on Spotify attracts one of the largest audience in the medium (an estimated 11 million listeners), bowed to Neil Young and Joni Mitchell in a Sunday evening video communique in which he apologized for being Joe Rogan, promised a more conscientious and balanced approach to his future shows, and Spotify likewise promised higher Covid-19 standards. “I am going to do my best in the future to balance things out. I’m going to do my best,” he said. “I pissed you off, I’m sorry.” "
Rogan was not silenced but promised he would try to do better. End of story in my opinion. Young had an effect and it was not to silence Rogan but to cause him to question what is proper by way of balance in addressing the issue.
Of course, he may just be practicing jujitsu and has no intention of change.
Opinions?