This is no erosion of first amendment rights, you have not ever been able to say words like this on network TV and only recently have the rules been relaxed to allow it after hours
It's not that I'm worried about it being on TV. Everybody knows the 7 words you can't say on TV. Shit, Piss, Fuck, wise and beautiful woman, beautiful being, Motherfucker, and tits.
It's that there exists now a "published opinion" from the Supreme Court saying "Fuck" by itself has sexual overtones. This has ALWAYS been a question mark.
The definition of obscenity in most jurisdictions, and certainly in my own (Florida) says that for something to be obscene, it must follow the below definition (copied and pasted from the statutes)
(10) "Obscene" means the status of material which:
(a) The average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
(b) Depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct as specifically defined herein; and
(c) Taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
You rubes out there: prurient means "Arousing or appealing to sexual desire."
Saying the word "fuck" by itself could ordinarily not pass the first 2 parts of the test. Maybe now we teeter closer.
I say all that about obscenity because obscenity is not protected speech. By defining "fuck" as a word with sexual roots, he pushes us closer to a world where the word "fuck" by itself is obscene.
If you commit obscenity it generally means jail time. Ask 2 Live Crew.
Stubbing my toe in a restaurant and shouting "FUCK!" ordinarily doesn't get you arrested. Maybe now it will.
BTW I never said anything about the court deciding the free speech aspect of that case as described in the article. I only mentioned Scalia's published opinion which defines what "fuck" by itself means to the Supreme Court.