• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Free Thinkers and Sheeple

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Yeah I know your neocon political compass is greatly skewed to the right....I was just trying to help..geez

repeat after me: Just becasue he is not a bushie does not = lib
repeat after me: Just becasue he is not a bushie does not = lib
repeat after me: Just becasue he is not a bushie does not = lib


oh yeah and just becasue someone doesent blow oreilly in their dreams every night does not make you a commie...


feel better?
great. now come join the world!

I'm sorry on the last of your 37 edits I missed the "blow oreilly in their dreams every night" part.

Are you referring to me?
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Yeah I know your neocon political compass is greatly skewed to the right....I was just trying to help..geez

repeat after me: Just becasue he is not a bushie does not = lib
repeat after me: Just becasue he is not a bushie does not = lib
repeat after me: Just becasue he is not a bushie does not = lib

feel better?

How many times you gonna edit those posts? Would it make you feel better if I called him a "moderate liberal"? I agree, Stunt isn't a leftist - that's insulting (I reserve that for the lunatic fringe).

He's really a moderate liberal, Clinton-esque. About what I was at that age during the 90's.
Hahaha :thumbsup:

There would be no way I'd ever vote Bush or Kerry...
 
Infohawk, Since you have not said anything new, I will wait until you do...feel free to flap your lips...

PS. I love the quip, especially with you, i know you love it! :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: Stunt

If I have to repeat myself, it's because you ignore arguments you can't answer and then later pretend they were never offered. You are unreasonable. You believe in ideas for which you have no evidence. You are also intellectually dishonest, claiming you believe absolutely in something despite the fact you recognize there are exceptions.
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Psst Infohawk - you are calling Stunt a troll. I don't think anyone on this forum (besides you) considers him a troll.

But Stunt, an admittedly leftist poster, considers you a troll. Might want to take note of that.
:thumbsup::laugh:
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: alchemize
Psst Infohawk - you are calling Stunt a troll. I don't think anyone on this forum (besides you) considers him a troll.

But Stunt, an admittedly leftist poster, considers you a troll. Might want to take note of that.
:thumbsup::laugh:

I take it you are going back to not wanting to have a serious discussion?
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: Stunt
Since you have not said anything new, I will wait until you do.

Stunt's guide to never admitting he's wrong:

1. Say anything, even if it's not true. Do not present evidence for claims
2. When presented with evidence, ignore it, deny it, or mispresent it
3. Personally attack other poster
4. Pretend you addressed previously ignored arguments.
5. Repeat 4 as necessary
 
Originally posted by: Stunt

Stunt's guide to never admitting he's wrong:

1. Say anything, even if it's not true. Do not present evidence for claims
2. When presented with evidence, ignore it, deny it, or mispresent it
3. Personally attack other poster
4. Pretend you addressed previously ignored arguments.
5. Repeat 4 as necessary

:laugh:

 
Originally posted by: chrisms
This place sucks. Because what I'm saying right now doesn't matter, nobody cares what you said, and the guy below me is going the be a douche either way. It's best just to come here for the interesting articles which can rarely come up.

haha, nice!
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Stunt

Stunt's guide to never admitting he's wrong:

1. Say anything, even if it's not true. Do not present evidence for claims
2. When presented with evidence, ignore it, deny it, or mispresent it
3. Personally attack other poster
4. Pretend you addressed previously ignored arguments.
5. Repeat 4 as necessary

:laugh:

:thumbsup:

CsG
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Jealous of your using fallacious reasoning? No. Are you trying to troll again? :roll: And it has to do with your reasoning. Attacking someone's reasoning is not off-topic.

Psst Infohawk - you are calling Stunt a troll. I don't think anyone on this forum (besides you) considers him a troll.

But Stunt, an admittedly leftist poster, considers you a troll. Might want to take note of that.

Stunt may not normally be a troll but he sure has made a valiant effort to be one in this thread. Between his twisting and obfuscation, it's pretty obvious he's trying to dig his way out of a statement and position he admittedly can't prove.

CsG
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Jealous of your using fallacious reasoning? No. Are you trying to troll again? :roll: And it has to do with your reasoning. Attacking someone's reasoning is not off-topic.

Psst Infohawk - you are calling Stunt a troll. I don't think anyone on this forum (besides you) considers him a troll.

But Stunt, an admittedly leftist poster, considers you a troll. Might want to take note of that.

Stunt may not normally be a troll but he sure has made a valiant effort to be one in this thread. Between his twisting and obfuscation, it's pretty obvious he's trying to dig his way out of a statement and position he admittedly can't prove.

CsG
Actually to correct you; "statement and position he admittedly can't prove."

...and you cannot disprove. Nothing can be proven 100% of the time, even the election process itself has a human error associated with it. The votes were counted correctly 99.999% of the time but one must assume 100% for all intents and purposes.

I have never seen an instance where extreme opposites have come together and solved something, therefore it is my perception that you need a moderate/moderation. Seeing how you seem to have the same perception as I (unable to propose reasoning showing extremists can work together on an issue), I can therefore assume my statement is correct.
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
...and you cannot disprove.
Actually, you were provided with a counter-example by cad that contradicted your position. More importantly, failure to disprove a thing is not proof for that thing.

Seeing how you seem to have the same perception as I (unable to propose reasoning showing extremists can work together on an issue), I can therefore assume my statement is correct.
Cad likes to type it "ASSume".
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Stunt
...and you cannot disprove.
Actually, you were provided with a counter-example by cad that contradicted your position. More importantly, failure to disprove a thing is not proof for that thing.

Seeing how you seem to have the same perception as I (unable to propose reasoning showing extremists can work together on an issue), I can therefore assume my statement is correct.
Cad likes to type it "ASSume".

:thumbsup:

CsG
 
Originally posted by: chrisms
This place sucks. Because what I'm saying right now doesn't matter, nobody cares what you said, and the guy below me is going the be a douche either way. It's best just to come here for the interesting articles which can rarely come up.



WINNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ding, ding ding
 
Originally posted by: halleberries
Originally posted by: chrisms
This place sucks. Because what I'm saying right now doesn't matter, nobody cares what you said, and the guy below me is going the be a douche either way. It's best just to come here for the interesting articles which can rarely come up.



WINNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ding, ding ding


How would you know?
 
Back
Top