free Artwork

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Haw haw hwa, thanks for the link, but Kandinsky SUCKS! Monkeys rolling around in their own poop on a campus throwing paint at the canvas can produce a 'Kandisnky Modern Painting". There were studies done where 4th graders threw paint at a canvas, then snobby art buyers couldn't even tell the difference.

I have a mp3 class on my website, it's great, it's called "Why modern art sucks" 20,000 years to civilization, 2 generations to savegry. You'll all love it

www.theacademy2004.com
It's under the 'counter-culture' section.
 

3point14

Golden Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,843
0
0
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
Haw haw hwa, thanks for the link, but Kandinsky SUCKS! Monkeys rolling around in their own poop on a campus throwing paint at the canvas can produce a 'Kandisnky Modern Painting". There were studies done where 4th graders threw paint at a canvas, then snobby art buyers couldn't even tell the difference.

I have a mp3 class on my website, it's great, it's called "Why modern art sucks" 20,000 years to civilization, 2 generations to savegry. You'll all love it

www.theacademy2004.com
It's under the 'counter-culture' section.

It seems you have a pretty obtuse appreciation of art, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion. :beer::D
Kandinsky was a precursor to most great [post-modern] art that came from Europe (e.g. Bauhause) and other parts of the world. Most of the complexity of his work cannot be copied by a 4th grader. That would be obvious if you took any Undergraduate or Graduate art courses dealing with modern and post-modern art. Don't get me wrong, I do not mean to squabble; it is just that I heard the "modern art sux0rz and can be done by any half-wit with a brush" argumentation many times before. I guess what I am trying to say is that the Krasnyansky print is nothing like an original Kandinsky. But this is only my opinion :).


B.T.W...... The cover picture on your home page is one of my favorites.