- Nov 6, 2005
- 20,984
- 3
- 0
No doubt about it, the race for the Minnesota Senate race has resulted in a razor thin
margin still favoring Coleman. But I believe the possible under count of Frankin votes is not fraud, but lies in human and machine error in various locations of Frankin strength.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200...8AuPhTSzbAn6WyPO2s0NUE
And due to the fact that there is a paper record, it looks like all ballots will get a fresh examination when the post November 18'th recount begins. And if Coleman is lucky, he will find under counts in locations favoring him. So I tend to believe that there may be court challenges to what ballots are and are not totally reexamined. Not mentioned in the link is my understanding that Minnesota State law may end up kicking the seating question to the US Senate.
In a related area, I do not quite understand what is taking Alaska this long, it was my understanding that the election hung on counting a mere 40,000 absentee ballots. And since the class of absentee ballots are likely to be statistically different that the class of general election ballots, a pro Begish bias in the former would be required to unseat Stevens. If a pro Stevens bias in the class of absentee ballot exists, its would seem to make it a no brainer that Begish would be toast.
But for reasons I do not understand, not even a clue yet.
As for Georgia, it looks like Chambliss came .2% short of the requited 50%, so it forces a early December run off with the democrat. And maybe the first referendum on Obama. With the R's perhaps arguing they need to prevent a Democratic rubber stamp congress and the D's saying we need to prevent gridlock.
Meaning Lieberman staying democratic takes on new importance.
margin still favoring Coleman. But I believe the possible under count of Frankin votes is not fraud, but lies in human and machine error in various locations of Frankin strength.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200...8AuPhTSzbAn6WyPO2s0NUE
And due to the fact that there is a paper record, it looks like all ballots will get a fresh examination when the post November 18'th recount begins. And if Coleman is lucky, he will find under counts in locations favoring him. So I tend to believe that there may be court challenges to what ballots are and are not totally reexamined. Not mentioned in the link is my understanding that Minnesota State law may end up kicking the seating question to the US Senate.
In a related area, I do not quite understand what is taking Alaska this long, it was my understanding that the election hung on counting a mere 40,000 absentee ballots. And since the class of absentee ballots are likely to be statistically different that the class of general election ballots, a pro Begish bias in the former would be required to unseat Stevens. If a pro Stevens bias in the class of absentee ballot exists, its would seem to make it a no brainer that Begish would be toast.
But for reasons I do not understand, not even a clue yet.
As for Georgia, it looks like Chambliss came .2% short of the requited 50%, so it forces a early December run off with the democrat. And maybe the first referendum on Obama. With the R's perhaps arguing they need to prevent a Democratic rubber stamp congress and the D's saying we need to prevent gridlock.
Meaning Lieberman staying democratic takes on new importance.