Fox News sinks to a new low - edits Obama's SOTU speech

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Pulsar

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2003
5,224
306
126
Because I never realized you were such a tool. Sure you've always been a self aggrandizing bragart but I never in my wildest dreams thought you'd be one to defend a farce like faux news

Speaking the truth that you disagree with = Tool.
Speaking lies that you agree with = Good.

Gotcha.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,484
20,010
146
Because I never realized you were such a tool. Sure you've always been a self aggrandizing bragart but I never in my wildest dreams thought you'd be one to defend a farce like faux news

After all these years, Nancy, I figured you'd have caught on to the fact that I defend factual, empirical evidence, no matter what that may be.

That it may, at times, rub sand in that delicate, politically biased vagina of yours makes no difference to me.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Tell you what.... we'll start making up random bullshit about you that's totally untrue. Then we'll attack anyone who tries to refute it the same way you do. How's that sound?

Exactly like a Fox News pundit show. :p
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
After all these years, Nancy, I figured you'd have caught on to the fact that I defend factual, empirical evidence, no matter what that may be.

Really, babydoll? You offered the Sherrod "racist" tripe before having all the facts concerning the story....
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,484
20,010
146
Really, babydoll? You offered the Sherrod "racist" tripe before having all the facts concerning the story....

Why, yes, sugartits, I did, and as soon as I found out the truth, I posted a correction and edited the title.

I never claimed I was a perfect, godlike person. Only that I "defend factual, empirical evidence, no matter what that may be."

Proving I've been mistaken before does not discredit everything I say forevermore. (Especially if I am readily willing to correct myself.)

It makes me human.
 
Last edited:

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,484
20,010
146
Yes, this is the case.

According to the court's interpretation of FCC regulations, a network can completely distort the facts of a story - even to the point of lying to viewers. But God help that station if they show the bare nipple of a woman, even if only for a few seconds.

Oh look! Some new koolaid drinker hasn't read the thread!
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,995
8,593
136
Defending Fox is a classic fool's errand, *aside from what Amused and IBMer was discussing.*

Their content is inarguably propagandistic in nature no matter how you slice it.

Watching Fox is like watching an ocean liner sink, or a building fall apart in an earthquake, or watching a tidal wave destroy a coastline. You get the morbid fascination from watching, the emotion thus derived.....and absolutely nothing of value in the way of forming an accurate and truthful opinion about anything they "report" or editorialize because they have ZERO creditability and consistently lie, disinform, mischaracterize, bamboozle and deceive to propagate their ideology.

Their whole programming is driven by an ultra-conservative agenda and the folks that watch FOX is so sadly desperate for news of how the country is being threatened by the foreign born black fascist muslim and his horde of commie socialist tax and spend disciples that want to take their guns away. To what useful end?

They would rather believe lies and ignore the obvious truth all around them to keep their fear and their paranoia wrapped around them like a security blanket.

It's simply amazing the lengths to which some would defend Fox with more obvious lies and deceptive/misleading allegory in the face of what is obvious to anyone who would bother to seek the truth of a matter.
 
Last edited:

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,484
20,010
146
Defending Fox is a classic fool's errand, *aside from what Amused and IBMer was discussing.*

Their content is inarguably propagandistic in nature no matter how you slice it.

Watching Fox is like watching an ocean liner sink, or a building fall apart in an earthquake, or watching a tidal wave destroy a coastline. You get the morbid fascination from watching, the emotion thus derived.....and absolutely nothing of value in the way of forming an accurate and truthful opinion about anything they "report" or editorialize because they have ZERO creditablility and consistently lie, disinform, mischaracterize, bamboozle and deceive to propagate their ideology.

Their whole programming is driven by an ultra-conservative agenda and the folks that watch FOX is so sadly desperate for news of how the country is being threatened by the foreign born black fascist muslim and his horde of commie socialist tax and spend disciples that want to take their guns away.

They would rather believe lies and ignore the obvious truth all around them to keep their fear and their paranoia wrapped around them like a security blanket.

It's simply amazing the lengths to which some would defend Fox with more obvious lies and deceptive/misleading allegory in the face of what is obvious to anyone who would bother to seek the truth of a matter.

What is that old saying about removing the plank in one's own eye before bitching about the speck in anothers?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txjXBx9-2c0

It simply amazes me how the left demonizes Fox while ignoring MSNBC (as the worst example) and a whole host of other news stations. It's almost like an automagical bias detector.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
What is that old saying about removing the plank in one's own eye before bitching about the speck in anothers?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txjXBx9-2c0

It simply amazes me how the left demonizes Fox while ignoring MSNBC (as the worst example) and a whole host of other news stations. It's almost like an automagical bias detector.

The Left:rolleyes: One doesn't have to be on the Left to demonize Faux Noise as Bullshit. MSNBC is bullshit too, in fact all Cable TV News is Bullshit. I don't watch any of it if I can help it and you won't see me defending MSNBC.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Dawn
Because I never realized you were such a tool. Sure you've always been a self aggrandizing bragart but I never in my wildest dreams thought you'd be one to defend a farce like faux news


After all these years, Nancy, I figured you'd have caught on to the fact that I defend factual, empirical evidence, no matter what that may be.

That it may, at times, rub sand in that delicate, politically biased vagina of yours makes no difference to me.

Ka Pow
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Dawn
All this time and effort making a case for Faux news and in the end they are still going to be seen as a bullshit org. Why bother Amused, unless you are some kind of fan


Funny, you didn't deride the others for all their time and effort spreading outright fabrications.

Gee... I wonder why?

Murdock is that you?
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Fox News sinks to a new low - if that's possible. They edit out the laughter in Obama's SOTU speech and splice in sounds of crickets chirping and then claim - his jokes fell flat?

WTF?

From the January 26 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends

Actual speech - see minutes 34 and 48 and you can hear the laughter

And this is supposed to be from the news section of Fox, not the op-ed journalists.

Is it fair and balanced? You decide.

..

HAHA that's pretty clever. I dig it.
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
35,140
2,289
126
I don't guess that F&F ever mentioned that the whole thing was a joke? Media Matters cut off the guy talking at the end.
 

IBMer

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2000
1,137
0
76
It simply amazes me how the left demonizes Fox while ignoring MSNBC (as the worst example) and a whole host of other news stations. It's almost like an automagical bias detector.

In all honesty, if you look at the numbers, most people don't watch MSNBC.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,995
8,593
136
What is that old saying about removing the plank in one's own eye before bitching about the speck in anothers?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txjXBx9-2c0

It simply amazes me how the left demonizes Fox while ignoring MSNBC (as the worst example) and a whole host of other news stations. It's almost like an automagical bias detector.

Fair enough on the specific topic of fundraising. And thanks for not lying about or denying the despicable behavior of Fox that I posted about, I respect that.:thumbsup:
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,484
20,010
146
Fair enough on the specific topic of fundraising. And thanks for not lying about or denying the despicable behavior of Fox that I posted about, I respect that.:thumbsup:

Oh, I could post a lot more than fundraising.

Here, the MSNBC NEWS team, not an opinion show, deliberately conceals the race of a man carrying a gun at a tea party gathering, announces the tea party is all white and armed to inflame racial tensions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYKQJ4-N7LI

In the heavily edited and zoomed video MSNBC shows us, all we are shown is a gun, but cannot tell the race of the person holding it. The reporters go on and on about white racist tea party members carrying guns and how scary that is to blacks. They go on and on about how the Tea Party is all about white gun toting protesters being angry about a black man in the white house.

But...

OOPS!!!

The guy with the guns is really black!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCZBO6rTfnQ

Fox catches them at this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIvaEjxZuAA


Bias has been in the media since media existed. Only now, there is much more media so the bias can be more specialized among outlets.

But the sure way to see which way your own bias lay, is to see which station pisses you off enough to call "despicable."

Everyone acts as if this is all something new and dangerous. I guess no one ever heard of Walter Winchell.

And I fail to see how one can support freedom of speech, yet turn around and think there should be some control over what a news outlet may, or may not report. Yet another sign that the American left is anything but liberal.
 
Last edited:

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
I'll admit to not reading the whole thread (I got through 3/4 of page 1 and most of page 4) but....

The thread is and of itself a completely useless waste of disk space. That show is equivalent to The View. It isn't news and was never news and as such, anything they say is geared towards a specific target audience (the evil librul hatin', God fearin', real Amuricans) that don't care if they edited out a laugh in an attempt to make their goober audience laugh.