• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

FOX News Just Exposed the Truth Behind 9/11

T

TakenAptly

Junior Member
Repost of this with a little more info. Maybe it won't get locked this time.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM

Scientists find nano-thermite in WTC dust.


I realize that Richard Gage isn't the most credible architects (he does have as many years experience as he claims, but no experience with high rises.)
Though I don't find it relevant, he's not doing the research himself, he's merely the "speaker". So the attention has to be changed unto the people giving him his information.



Publication referred to in the video:

Formally published in a peer-reviewed Chemical Physics journal, today:
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe pp.7-31 (25)
http://www.bentham-open.org/pa...02/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen

Authors qualifications:
Niels H. Harrit - Dr. Harrit is an associate professor of chemistry
at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and is the author/or
co-author of nearly 60 peer reviewed scientific papers. Dr. Harrit has
also served on numerous occasions as a peer reviewer/referee for
scientific papers written by others.

Jeffrey Farrer - Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Minnesota. Studied solid-state reactions and migration of interfaces in oxide and nitride materials systems. Received a B.S. in Physics from Brigham Young University.

Steven E. Jones - Ph.D. in physics

Kevin R. Ryan - Site Manager at Environmental Health Laboratories (EHL) in South Bend, Indiana. This is a division of UL, the product-compliance and testing giant. Because UL certified the WTC steel for its ability to withstand fires, the steel's performance on September 11 is obviously of concern to the company. While Ryan's letter does not constitute an official statement from Underwriters Laboratories, it suggests incipient disagreements between UL and NIST about the true cause of the WTC collapses.

Frank M. Legge - Had trouble finding what he has a Ph.D in.
one of his journals:
http://www.indytruth.org/libra...ilityTheory17Legge.pdf

Daniel Farnsworth - physics student, assisted Farrer with research.

Gregg Roberts - technical writer, providing editorial assistance

Gourley & Larsen I couldn't find anything on.


Man .....doesn't this crap ever go away??
Click to expand...

Why should it if there is still dispute over something as significant as this?



While entertaining, the thread justification is based on what was debunked in the previous thread(s).
Physics and chemistry have not proven the CT case; nor has any type of gun (let alone a smoking gun) been located over the past 8 years. Wild ass theories are grasped onto using selective myopia; ignoring the additional evidence which invalidates each theory.

Locked until something is developed that can standup against engineering & scientific analysis.

Senior Anandtech Mdoerator
Common Courtesy
 
Originally posted by: TakenAptly
Originally posted by: alchemize
What a great investigator you are, can't discover a repost....
Click to expand...

And how intelligent you are to realize that this topic is over the video (maybe you should read the title), and realize that the publication is just to add credibility to the video for people who need it.
Click to expand...

The video still doesn't have any credibility, because the "expert" presenting the argument doesn't present a complete story. Like virtually ALL conspiracy theorists, he's become fascinated with small details, without realizing that the broader argument he's making doesn't make any sense.
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: TakenAptly
Originally posted by: alchemize
What a great investigator you are, can't discover a repost....
Click to expand...

And how intelligent you are to realize that this topic is over the video (maybe you should read the title), and realize that the publication is just to add credibility to the video for people who need it.
Click to expand...

The video still doesn't have any credibility, because the "expert" presenting the argument doesn't present a complete story. Like virtually ALL conspiracy theorists, he's become fascinated with small details, without realizing that the broader argument he's making doesn't make any sense.
Click to expand...

The problem I see is that the broader argument the government has tried to make doesn't make any fucking sense.. "Men from the Arab world hate America because we're rich and free. Therefore they attack us. The planes caused the steel to weaken and the buildings fell. Since the events were so cut and dry, the investigation will be cheaper than the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal. The debris will be sent to China to be recycled. So therefore we must attack Iraq. And now we should spend billions and billions of taxpayer money on the anti-terrorism industry. And, we must change our laws and give up some freedoms in order to ensure our safety."

So, people believe conspiracies..

I say.. the truth is somewhere between what the government tells us and the conspiracies..
 
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: TakenAptly
Originally posted by: alchemize
What a great investigator you are, can't discover a repost....
Click to expand...

And how intelligent you are to realize that this topic is over the video (maybe you should read the title), and realize that the publication is just to add credibility to the video for people who need it.
Click to expand...

The video still doesn't have any credibility, because the "expert" presenting the argument doesn't present a complete story. Like virtually ALL conspiracy theorists, he's become fascinated with small details, without realizing that the broader argument he's making doesn't make any sense.
Click to expand...

The problem I see is that the broader argument the government has tried to make doesn't make any fucking sense.. "Men from the Arab world hate America because we're rich and free. Therefore they attack us. The planes caused the steel to weaken and the buildings fell. Since the events were so cut and dry, the investigation will be cheaper than the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal. The debris will be sent to China to be recycled. So therefore we must attack Iraq. And now we should spend billions and billions of taxpayer money on the anti-terrorism industry. And, we must change our laws and give up some freedoms in order to ensure our safety."

So, people believe conspiracies..

I say.. the truth is somewhere between what the government tells us and the conspiracies..
Click to expand...

I don't know, it seems to me that if the government was behind 9/11 and wanted to use it as an excuse to attack Iraq...they probably would have framed Iraq, not Afghanistan, a country that the Bush administration seemed to have little interest in.

I agree with the general idea that mistrust of the government is part of what fuels conspiracy theories, but that's not an excuse for people to just disconnect their brains. I think the Bush administration was a very bad combination of incompetent and conniving, and I disliked them as much as anyone, but the reason I'm not jumping on the conspiracy bandwagon is that it makes no sense.
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: TakenAptly
Originally posted by: alchemize
What a great investigator you are, can't discover a repost....
Click to expand...

And how intelligent you are to realize that this topic is over the video (maybe you should read the title), and realize that the publication is just to add credibility to the video for people who need it.
Click to expand...

The video still doesn't have any credibility, because the "expert" presenting the argument doesn't present a complete story. Like virtually ALL conspiracy theorists, he's become fascinated with small details, without realizing that the broader argument he's making doesn't make any sense.
Click to expand...

The problem I see is that the broader argument the government has tried to make doesn't make any fucking sense.. "Men from the Arab world hate America because we're rich and free. Therefore they attack us. The planes caused the steel to weaken and the buildings fell. Since the events were so cut and dry, the investigation will be cheaper than the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal. The debris will be sent to China to be recycled. So therefore we must attack Iraq. And now we should spend billions and billions of taxpayer money on the anti-terrorism industry. And, we must change our laws and give up some freedoms in order to ensure our safety."

So, people believe conspiracies..

I say.. the truth is somewhere between what the government tells us and the conspiracies..
Click to expand...

I don't know, it seems to me that if the government was behind 9/11 and wanted to use it as an excuse to attack Iraq...they probably would have framed Iraq, not Afghanistan, a country that the Bush administration seemed to have little interest in.

I agree with the general idea that mistrust of the government is part of what fuels conspiracy theories, but that's not an excuse for people to just disconnect their brains. I think the Bush administration was a very bad combination of incompetent and conniving, and I disliked them as much as anyone, but the reason I'm not jumping on the conspiracy bandwagon is that it makes no sense.
Click to expand...

What part makes no sense?
 
Also notice the OP has 17 posts.......
First of all if we were going to believe what the OP posted we would need to know that the OP was credible...via posting history which there is none!!

For the OP to even bring this repost up and actually believe what has been debunked by many people knowledgeable about this is just amazing.

Whats funny is only the conspiracy theorists are claiming that this is of major significance....
why? becauase all other experts are laughbing to hard to get involved in such nonesense!

http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm


Then we have the issue of the truthfulness of the Op`s topic title......

The truth according to who?? The OP...who is one of them......
 
Originally posted by: TakenAptly

Topic Title: FOX News Just Exposed the Truth Behind 9/11
Click to expand...

Cue the theramin (old sci-fi movie sound effect)...

:music: oooooohWHEEEEEEEoooo-o-o-o-o-o-ooh :music: 😛

The Fruit Loop Brigade is on the march, and I'm picking up baa-a-ahd vibrations.. :roll:
 
Since you apparently put Fox News in the title to add some credibility to the story ( 😕 ), it's worth noting that isn't Fox News.
 
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Egpyt has a great River called De Nile
Click to expand...

FOOL here. I don't know. Steel shipped to China really fast . 3 buildings all collapsing in a strange manner into own footprints . Hugh jet hit pent. small hole little debree. The Crash out in the country . Small hole in ground little debree. We have all seen airline crashes . Not same at all.

What your asking me to do on faith is except something thats harder for me to except. Than it is to except God as Lord and Master..

Way better proof there is GOD than what occurred on 9/11 as happening as reported seriously . Your reaching along ways away from Math to except those findings.



 
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Egpyt has a great River called De Nile
Click to expand...

FOOL here. I don't know. Steel shipped to China really fast . 3 buildings all collapsing in a strange manner into own footprints . Hugh jet hit pent. small hole little debree. The Crash out in the country . Small hole in ground little debree. We have all seen airline crashes . Not same at all.

What your asking me to do on faith is except something thats harder for me to except. Than it is to except God as Lord and Master..

Way better proof there is GOD than what occurred on 9/11 as happening as reported seriously . Your reaching along ways away from Math to except those findings.
Click to expand...

Your posts really do make my day complete.
 
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Egpyt has a great River called De Nile
Click to expand...

FOOL here. I don't know. Steel shipped to China really fast . 3 buildings all collapsing in a strange manner into own footprints . Hugh jet hit pent. small hole little debree. The Crash out in the country . Small hole in ground little debree. We have all seen airline crashes . Not same at all.

What your asking me to do on faith is except something thats harder for me to except. Than it is to except God as Lord and Master..

Way better proof there is GOD than what occurred on 9/11 as happening as reported seriously . Your reaching along ways away from Math to except those findings.
Click to expand...

This is beautiful. Nemesis 1, never stop posting. Never stop telling people your opinions. Never stop.
 
let me see if I get this straight

our government comes up with the most deceptive inside job ever - planting bombs in the WTC's, shooting down 2 other planes - leaves evidence that NOT ONE PERSON in NYC or Washington DC can get a photo of, or a whiff of for that matter - but they frame the wrong country by mistake?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top