• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

FOX : FOXES but OX : OXEN?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I have the answer: (I used the OED)

Ox is the only word in general English use which retains the orig. plural ending -en (the reflex of Old English -an) of the weak declension. An older umlaut plural xen, exen occurs in Old English (Mercian and Northumbrian respectively), whence app. the Old and Middle English forms exen, exin, and Middle English exon. A new plural oxes, found from the 14th cent., has survived only in regional and non-standard use. The genitive singular oxes for oxan appears in Old English (Northumbrian) in Lindisf. Gospels (cf. quot. OE1 at sense 1a), and an -s genitive is normal from the Middle English period onwards.
A number of compounds of the base form of the word correspond to compounds of the genitive in Old English; it is uncertain from the available evidence whether there is continuity between them. Examples are: OX-EYE n., OX-GALL n., OXGANG n., OXHERD n., OX-HORN n., OXLIP n., OXTAIL n., OX-TONGUE n. Compounds of oxen, which may represent either a reflex of the Old English genitive or the plural, occur sporadically in Middle English (cf. OX-EYE n. 2b, OXHOUSE n.). Recent compounds with the plural oxen are included among examples of compounds with the singular (see senses 6, 7); some cases may be accounted for by the influence of a plural second element.]

 
Originally posted by: Crono
?Brian, how do you make a word a plural??

?You put a ?s??put a ?s? at the end of it.?

?When??

?On weekends and holidays.?

?No, Brian. Let me show you.? So she asked this kid who knew everything. Irwin. ?Irwin, what?s the plural for ox??

?Ox. Oxen. The farmer used his oxen.?

?Brian??

?What??

?Brian, what?s the plural for box??

?Boxen. I bought 2 boxen of doughnuts.?

?No, Brian, no. Let?s try another one. Irwin, what?s the plural for goose??

?Geese. I saw a flock of geese.?

?Brian??

[Exasperated laughing]?Wha-a-at??

?What?s the plural for moose??

?Moosen! I saw a flock of MOOSEN! There were many of ?em. Many much moosen. Out in the woods?in the wood-es?in the woodsen. The meese want the food in the woodesen?food is the eatenesen?the meese want the food in the woodesenes?food in the woodesenes.?

?Brian. Brian! You?re an imbecile.?

?Imbecilen!?

?What? Are you speaking German, Brian??

?German?Germaine?Germaine?Jackson?Jackson 5?Tito!?

?Brian, what the hell are you talking about??

?I don?t know. I don?t know, really.?


That's what immediately came to my mind.
 
Its cause english is like the borg, it assimilates every other language into itself. So it may look like a borg on the outside but underneath its from some other species entirely.
 
No its because english USED to have multiple pluralization endings for words (like German), eventually nearly all were dropped in favor of -es. Ox is simply a leftover.
 
Actually, the English language was created in the "Matrix" but since you all took the red pill instead of the blue pill you will never know the truth!!
 
Back
Top