I think I remember seeing something about the top three teams moving up and the bottom three moving down, but now I can't find it. Just "The distribution of teams depends on the number of active members (RAC>100) on each project." Where was that?
It re-appeared after the SETI sprint, but is now overwritten by the announcement of the next sprint.Well............It's gone. Vanished. It used to be on the home page. RECENTLY.
Is there an advantage to reducing the queue size over simply aborting tasks that have not yet begun? I had understood that there was no real downside to aborting tasks, that would would be immediately available for others to crunch.The next project gets announced in 24 hours, so if you haven't yet begun to reduce the queue size of whatever your are currently running, now is the time to think about doing that. 🙂 BUNKERING starts tomorrow (in the USA) at 4pm EST, 3pm Central, 2pm Mountain, and 1pm Pacific. 20:00 UTC time. Actual racing starts 24 hours after that, of course. I am repeating this info, in the event we have any silent partners who may be keeping tabs and desiring to participate. (We'd love to hear from ya if that is the case. 🙂 )
Is there an advantage to reducing the queue size over simply aborting tasks that have not yet begun? I had understood that there was no real downside to aborting tasks, that would would be immediately available for others to crunch.
Well... Asteroids might not be liking me in about 46 minutes...Aborting = Make project server not like your PC. Therefore it gets untrusted and you won't have as many in progress tasks.
i.e SETI reduces your buffer to 1 if you abort too many tasks
Ah man! Not V-box again.Dang it. LHC again.
Ah that must have been it.I still don't think you can bunker Atlas. It has to communicate with its server directly. So anything you do to block networking should prevent it from working. The idea I had posted in the pentathlon was for Cosmology.