Former Iraqi General . . .

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
for a Pinata

Actually, the Administration's flawed policies have place the future of American troops - the Soldiers and Marines,
along with the safety of it's citizens - both home and abroad, in danger for all future dealings with any and all actions.

Our country WAS better than that, we treated all fairly and observed international laws because it preserved our way of life,
and justice without lowering itself to the level of terrorists and totalatarian governments.

Now we are no better, and in some cases worse because of the shameful policies that this Government is endorsing.

Repulsive Politics running the country . . . into the ground.
Sadly we will pay a bigger pentalty for their actions than any perceived gain of information that it may have produced.

You can't beat a confession out of a dead man, and it does no service to beat a confession into a detainee.

<CLIP>

Iraqi Maj. Gen. Abed Hamed Mowhoush was being stubborn with his American captors, and a series of intense beatings and creative interrogation tactics were not enough to break his will. On the morning of Nov. 26, 2003, a U.S. Army interrogator and a military guard grabbed a green sleeping bag, stuffed Mowhoush inside, wrapped him in an electrical cord, laid him on the floor and began to go to work. Again.

It was inside the sleeping bag that the 56-year-old detainee took his last breath through broken ribs, lying on the floor beneath a U.S. soldier in Interrogation Room 6 in the western Iraqi desert. Two days before, a secret CIA-sponsored group of Iraqi paramilitaries, working with Army interrogators, had beaten Mowhoush nearly senseless, using fists, a club and a rubber hose, according to classified documents

The sleeping bag was the idea of a soldier who remembered how his older brother used to force him into one, and how scared and vulnerable it made him feel. Senior officers in charge of the facility near the Syrian border believed that such "claustrophobic techniques" were approved ways to gain information from detainees, part of what military regulations refer to as a "fear up" tactic, according to military court documents.

The circumstances that led up to Mowhoush's death paint a vivid example of how the pressure to produce intelligence for anti-terrorism efforts and the war in Iraq led U.S. military interrogators to improvise and develop abusive measures, not just at Abu Ghraib but in detention centers elsewhere in Iraq, in Afghanistan and at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Mowhoush's ordeal in Qaim, over 16 days in November 2003, also reflects U.S. government secrecy surrounding some abuse cases and gives a glimpse into a covert CIA unit that was set up to foment rebellion before the war and took part in some interrogations during the insurgency.

The sleeping-bag interrogation and beatings were taking place in Qaim about the same time that soldiers at Abu Ghraib, outside Baghdad, were using dogs to intimidate detainees, putting women's underwear on their heads, forcing them to strip in front of female soldiers and attaching at least one to a leash. It was a time when U.S. interrogators were coming up with their own tactics to get detainees to talk, many of which they considered logical interpretations of broad-brush categories in the Army Field Manual, with labels such as "fear up" or "pride and ego down" or "futility."

Other tactics, such as some of those seen at Abu Ghraib, had been approved for one detainee at Guantanamo Bay and found their way to Iraq. Still others have been linked to official Pentagon guidance on specific techniques, such as the use of dogs.

Two Army soldiers with the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment in Fort Carson, Colo., are charged with killing Mowhoush with the sleeping-bag technique, and his death has been the subject of partially open court proceedings at the base in Colorado Springs. Two other soldiers alleged to have participated face potential nonjudicial punishment. Some details of the incident have been released and were previously reported. But an examination of numerous classified documents gathered during the criminal investigation into Mowhoush's death, and interviews with Defense Department officials and current and former intelligence officials, present a fuller picture of what happened and outline the role played in his interrogation by the CIA, its Iraqi paramilitaries and Special Forces soldiers.

Determining the details of the general's demise has been difficult because the circumstances are listed as "classified" on his official autopsy, court records have been censored to hide the CIA's involvement in his questioning, and reporters have been removed from a Fort Carson courtroom when testimony relating to the CIA has surfaced.

Despite Army investigators' concerns that the CIA and Special Forces soldiers also were involved in serious abuse leading up to Mowhoush's death, the investigators reported they did not have the authority to fully look into their actions. The CIA inspector general's office has launched an investigation of at least one CIA operative who identified himself to soldiers only as "Brian." The CIA declined to comment on the matter, as did an Army spokesman, citing the ongoing criminal cases.

Although Mowhoush's death certificate lists his cause of death as "asphyxia due to smothering and chest compression," the Dec. 2, 2003, autopsy, quoted in classified documents and released with redactions, showed that Mowhoush had "contusions and abrasions with pattern impressions" over much of his body, and six fractured ribs. Investigators believed a "long straight-edge instrument" was used on Mowhoush, as well as an "object like the end of an M-16" rifle.

"Although the investigation indicates the death was directly related to the non-standard interrogation methods employed on 26 NOV, the circumstances surrounding the death are further complicated due to Mowhoush being interrogated and reportedly beaten by members of a Special Forces team and other government agency (OGA) employees two days earlier," said a secret Army memo dated May 10, 2004.

The Walk-In

Hours after Mowhoush's death in U.S. custody on Nov. 26, 2003, military officials issued a news release stating that the prisoner had died of natural causes after complaining of feeling sick. Army psychological-operations officers quickly distributed leaflets designed to convince locals that the general had cooperated and outed key insurgents.

</theres more, much more - register & read>

The appoligists will come along to say that it's OK to do this, or to say that it never really happened - just liberal media spin.
Idiots blazing allong with their eyes wide shut, not seeing the disgrace that they support.





 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
If memory serves, this guy was the head of the Iraqi Air Force. If General Jumper (our AF Chief of Staff) had been captured and beaten to death by our enemy, we'd have gone thermonuclear by now . . .
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,783
6,341
126
The more of these stories I read, the more I just go WTF? When can we start calling Dubyah "Saddam Lite"?
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Iraqi Maj. Gen. Abed Hamed Mowhoush was being stubborn with his American captors, and a series of intense beatings and creative interrogation tactics were not enough to break his will. On the morning of Nov. 26, 2003, a U.S. Army interrogator and a military guard grabbed a green sleeping bag, stuffed Mowhoush inside, wrapped him in an electrical cord, laid him on the floor and began to go to work. Again.

It was inside the sleeping bag that the 56-year-old detainee took his last breath through broken ribs, lying on the floor beneath a U.S. soldier in Interrogation Room 6 in the western Iraqi desert. Two days before, a secret CIA-sponsored group of Iraqi paramilitaries, working with Army interrogators, had beaten Mowhoush nearly senseless, using fists, a club and a rubber hose, according to classified documents.

Just a little fraternity hazing, right Bushies? Nothing that doesn't go on every day in fraternity houses on college campuses all across America, right Bushies?

What a disgrace.

How can Bush find the nerve to continue to ask God to bless America?

Does he think God is as stupid as Americans?
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: Czar
I wonder who are left thinking there is no torture going on there?

Only the corpses are no longer thinking there is no torture there.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,868
10,657
147
Unspeakably sad. Unbearably wrong.

Let's just see one of our coterie of Bush apologists waltz in here with some lame "But Clinton got a blow job" misdirection.
 

EyeMNathan

Banned
Feb 15, 2004
1,078
0
0
U.S. soldiers have been abusing prisoners and even civilians for decades.

It is hardly specific to any single administration. This stuff goes back to WW2, Korea, Vietnam, and so on.

Why is it this way? Who knows, might be the conditions that soldiers overseas have to deal with.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Originally posted by: EyeMNathan
U.S. soldiers have been abusing prisoners and even civilians for decades.

It is hardly specific to any single administration. This stuff goes back to WW2, Korea, Vietnam, and so on.

Why is it this way? Who knows, might be the conditions that soldiers overseas have to deal with.

War, from what I understand is can be one of the worst expriences of your life.

It's true though, the United States has never had a real problem killing civilians. Dresden for example.
 

EyeMNathan

Banned
Feb 15, 2004
1,078
0
0
Originally posted by: Tab
Originally posted by: EyeMNathan
U.S. soldiers have been abusing prisoners and even civilians for decades.

It is hardly specific to any single administration. This stuff goes back to WW2, Korea, Vietnam, and so on.

Why is it this way? Who knows, might be the conditions that soldiers overseas have to deal with.

War, from what I understand is can be one of the worst expriences of your life.

It's true though, the United States has never had a real problem killing civilians. Dresden for example.

The reason the U.S. seems to do it more than others is pretty simple, though. The U.S. has the most troops overseas of any nation, and deploys troops into combat more than any other nation.

I would imagine that any army of any nation would have a serious issue with abuse of enemies or prisoners.

If you desensitize your troops into thinking the enemy is worthless, then they aren't going to care about abusing them and so on.