Former DPD officer guilty of official oppression in beating handcuffed man

Status
Not open for further replies.

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Americans need to wake up...this could have been any one of us......
What I find interesting is this officer in his own testimony was playing the "necessary force" card!!

Maximum sentence of a year -- you have to be kidding.......if it was anyone of us.....

DALLAS -- A Dallas County jury found a former Dallas police officer guilty of kicking and pepper spraying a handcuffed man as he lay on the ground in 2011.
Quaitemes Wiliams was found guilty of official oppression, a charge that carries a maximum sentence of up to a year in jail. He is scheduled to be sentenced July 18.

“I did not expect this result,” Williams said moments after the verdict. He declined further comment.

Russell Wilson, the lead prosecutor, said the verdict sends an important message that police brutality will not be tolerated.

“It was obvious from viewing the videotape [...] that it was clear he had gone way over the line,” Wilson said.

The jury’s verdict came after Williams took the stand as the final witness during the two-day trial. He was adamant that he did nothing wrong.

“Every amount of force that we used was necessary force, and it was only the necessary force,” Williams said.

There is more......
http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/Jury-finds-former-Dallas-officer-guilty-in--264993791.html
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
I read another news article on this, and it talked about the Jury in this case being completely freaked out by what they saw on the video tape. I swear, it is becoming more and more clear that US citizens need to start investing and utilizing recording devices. I am thinking about getting a dashcam for my daughter and wife.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Quaitemes Wiliams....a ginger with a black name. Well at least some justice here. Better than guy who shot handcuffed man who got off scott free.
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
I wonder, now that the cop has been found guilty in court if this guy will sue him and the department. Did anyone see that one town who had to shut their police force down because of all the lawsuits and settlements that caused the town to almost go bankrupt? LOL

Man I tell you, if you have rogue abusive cops on your force you better fire them and give them the boot before they cut into your local budget.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
I wish every cop had video on them with EVERY stop. without this video the guy would never have been fired or found guilty.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Im sure he was surprised by the verdict. Cops often times get away with all sorts of crap like this or worse. Like the guy cupertino cops beat to death while screaming for his dad? Jury found them not guilty. Unbelievable!
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
"
A veteran officer who witnessed what happened immediately reported the incident.
"

This is the only reason the officer was caught. They grabbed the dashcam video within the 24-48 hour rollover cycle.

Back when they used tape these rollover 'policies' sort of made sense. But now that it's all digital, there's no reason to not store this for years.


What I find most interesting... Is that if an officer is accused of misconduct outside these couple day hold times they very rarely find the video... but... if the video exonerates an officer they mysteriously go back months if not years and get the footage.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
He was convicted because all his fellow officers on scene testified against him. Prolly wasnt liked. Either way justice served on 1 in a million.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
He was convicted because all his fellow officers on scene testified against him. Prolly wasnt liked. Either way justice served on 1 in a million.

my first thought is he wasn't liked by other officers.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
A good example of why we need as much recording of police activities as possible -- it's good for everyone involved.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
The thing is, the force used to subdue and arrest the guy was justified. It's when the guy was laying on the ground in cuffs and no longer resisting, that the officer coming up to spray and kick him in the face was over the line.

Use of force to arrest is one thing. Being a asshole after doing your job is not.
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
A good example of why we need as much recording of police activities as possible -- it's good for everyone involved.

I agree, I have seen a number of cities trying to implement the body cams. Apparently quite a few police unions are up in arms about it though. The ACLU is trying to establish some guidelines and suggestions on the body cams, like serious repercussions if the body cam "conveniently" gets shut off or "malfunctions" every time there is an incident with a citizen claiming there was abuse.

I think the body cams should just be a mandatory thing, it not only protects the citizens but also the cops. Man I could have sworn I read somewhere that they proved that cops were well behaved when they were monitored like this. Something like 80% of complaints against cops went down once they had them all wear body cams.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.