forbidden word issues

Pepsi90919

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,162
1
81
when it says you have a forbidden word, and you go back, take out whatever and hit submit again, it says you cannot post a message twice. why?
 

Zim Hosein

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Super Moderator
Nov 27, 1999
65,411
407
126
Originally posted by: guapo337
Originally posted by: Azraele
They put in something to help prevent double posting.

ive noticed.. so what the hell do you do

Refresh the forum thread list and edit your post, that works for me.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: guapo337
Originally posted by: Azraele
They put in something to help prevent double posting.

ive noticed.. so what the hell do you do
Don't use forbidden words. How hard is that?
Maybe you could post a list of forbidden words so that everyone will know what they are. Or would that be too hard?

;)

 

Codewiz

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2002
5,758
0
76
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: guapo337
Originally posted by: Azraele
They put in something to help prevent double posting.

ive noticed.. so what the hell do you do
Don't use forbidden words. How hard is that?

What a stupid comment......

About 2 months ago I was posting in a thread discussing some company and I was saying their business plan looked like AllAdvantage's business plan. Well at the time AllAdvantage was a forbidden word because back in the day people would try to refer everyone on the site so they banned the word. Well AllAdvantage has been out of business for a long time so it was pointless having the word banned.

I of course got the message saying it was banned. No way I could have known it was still banned but had to go through the hassle.

What was AWESOME was the fact that I PM'ed a MOD and they quickly took care of the problem(removed alladvantage as a forbidden word).

You can't possibly know every word that is forbidden here.
 

ProviaFan

Lifer
Mar 17, 2001
14,993
1
0
They're also nice about not being too picky with the filter. Understandably, they filter the to-poke-with-a-sharp-object word, but their software doesn't mind if you say constabulary. :)

Now, I've never understood why they filter the term that refers to a bulging men's money containing object, but perhaps it is due to similar issues such as those with that AllAdvantage thing. Anyway, I guess they'd explain if they felt it was important for us to know.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
Originally posted by: jliechty
Now, I've never understood why they filter the term that refers to a bulging men's money containing object, but perhaps it is due to similar issues such as those with that AllAdvantage thing. Anyway, I guess they'd explain if they felt it was important for us to know.

Because they are the "competition"?
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: jliechty
Now, I've never understood why they filter the term that refers to a bulging men's money containing object, but perhaps it is due to similar issues such as those with that AllAdvantage thing. Anyway, I guess they'd explain if they felt it was important for us to know.

Because they are the "competition"?

Can we say "Shadow Works"?
How about "HardForum"?
How about "techbargains"?
Or "PCAbusers"?

 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: jliechty
Now, I've never understood why they filter the term that refers to a bulging men's money containing object, but perhaps it is due to similar issues such as those with that AllAdvantage thing. Anyway, I guess they'd explain if they felt it was important for us to know.

Because they are the "competition"?

Can we say "Shadow Works"?
How about "HardForum"?
How about "techbargains"?
Or "PCAbusers"?
IIRC, Anandtech gets the most hits on the Hot Deals forum. With the possible exception of tbargains (and maybe not even them), I doubt those other forums see the same number of hits. I don't know this for a fact. It is an assumption, hence the question mark at the end of my previous post.

 

Barnaby W. Füi

Elite Member
Aug 14, 2001
12,343
0
0
i can understand (understand, not agree with) censoring curse words. but censoring things like fat wallet and all advantage? that's pretty ridiculous. this forum kills me sometimes.
 

Codewiz

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2002
5,758
0
76
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
i can understand (understand, not agree with) censoring curse words. but censoring things like fat wallet and all advantage? that's pretty ridiculous. this forum kills me sometimes.

I TOTALLY understand censoring alladvantage. You must have not been around when alladvantage was around. People were trying to post their reference number every 15 minutes. It got quite annoying. The only solution was to make it a forbidden word.
 

i can understand (understand, not agree with) censoring curse words. but censoring things like fat wallet and all advantage? that's pretty ridiculous. this forum kills me sometimes.

It all boils down to the members, abuse a word or phrase to the point of insanity and WHAMMO, banned word.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: guapo337
Originally posted by: Azraele
They put in something to help prevent double posting.

ive noticed.. so what the hell do you do

1) Simply hit the "back" button; 2) COPY the text including the "banned" word; 3) hit "back" again to get to the "reply" page and 4) Reply (again and) PASTE your reply (deleting offending word).

:p

:D

That was too easy . . . :)
 

Barnaby W. Füi

Elite Member
Aug 14, 2001
12,343
0
0
Originally posted by: Roger
i can understand (understand, not agree with) censoring curse words. but censoring things like fat wallet and all advantage? that's pretty ridiculous. this forum kills me sometimes.

It all boils down to the members, abuse a word or phrase to the point of insanity and WHAMMO, banned word.

i suppose that suggests that this forum will never "rise above" where it is right now, if the members take advantage of things like children sneaking around their parents' rules. i think alot of the problem is the anonymity of the moderators. there is no accountability, and lots of shady things happen because of that. yes, i have heard all of the arguments for it, but personally i don't agree with it. the vast majority of other forums do not do this. when you can personally speak with an individual moderator, and deal with them as an individual, it creates a relationship of trust and respect. the anonymous moderators in this forum create an atmosphere of fear and mistrust. i also believe the insanity of ATOT is in relation to said anonymity. instead of people coming to an understanding with moderators about what is acceptable and what is not (and therefore not doing insane things, because they respect the moderators and do not wish to lose their relationship of trust), people run around pushing and pushing, seeing what they can get away with. i'm not saying ATOT is the worst "chat" forum on the internet, and i'm not saying AT forums are the worst forums on the internet, but i think the anonymous moderators are a huge problem. look at ars and look at AT. the difference in quality of posts is amazing. then again its 5:40am and i am tired and rambling...must get to sleep...
 

i suppose that suggests that this forum will never "rise above" where it is right now, if the members take advantage of things like children sneaking around their parents' rules. i think alot of the problem is the anonymity of the moderators. there is no accountability, and lots of shady things happen because of that. yes, i have heard all of the arguments for it, but personally i don't agree with it. the vast majority of other forums do not do this. when you can personally speak with an individual moderator, and deal with them as an individual, it creates a relationship of trust and respect. the anonymous moderators in this forum create an atmosphere of fear and mistrust. i also believe the insanity of ATOT is in relation to said anonymity. instead of people coming to an understanding with moderators about what is acceptable and what is not (and therefore not doing insane things, because they respect the moderators and do not wish to lose their relationship of trust), people run around pushing and pushing, seeing what they can get away with. i'm not saying ATOT is the worst "chat" forum on the internet, and i'm not saying AT forums are the worst forums on the internet, but i think the anonymous moderators are a huge problem. look at ars and look at AT. the difference in quality of posts is amazing. then again its 5:40am and i am tired and rambling...must get to sleep...

Well seeing that you are comparing AT forums with others, how do you explain Hard Forum ?
They have moderators that are not hidden, how do you explain that ?
How many members does ARS have ?
How many members does AT have ?
There are many other factors you are not considering when you made the above statement, you must view all the forums as a whole and not base your judgments on just one issue.

I agree with anand's view point on how the forum is run, if the members acted with any type of maturity and did not abuse their privileges, the problems we (as a community) would be greatly be reduced.

You also have to realise that AT is a lot more famous than the other sites, therefor it is logical that you are going to see more riff raff joining up because of it.
 

DivideBYZero

Lifer
May 18, 2001
24,117
2
0
Originally posted by: jliechty
They're also nice about not being too picky with the filter. Understandably, they filter the to-poke-with-a-sharp-object word, but their software doesn't mind if you say constabulary. :)

Now, I've never understood why they filter the term that refers to a bulging men's money containing object, but perhaps it is due to similar issues such as those with that AllAdvantage thing. Anyway, I guess they'd explain if they felt it was important for us to know.

You can't say st@b? So you can't say 'Thanks for the info, I'll have a st@b at it' or 'It's a st@b in the dark, but it might just work'?

Why?