So I've been able to discern that 4770 <= 4850 < 4870. The 4770 looks like the best "bang for the buck" at $100, just barely slower than the 4850 (at least at 1680 or lower resolutions)... but my understanding is the 4870 may be needed for my 24" monitor at 1920x1200.
So for my money (less than $200), I'm looking at one of these 4870's:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/...2801%2CN82E16814102825
versus a 4770:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814150366
If I want to play FPS at 1920x1200, will the $109 HD 4770 stand a chance (I'd only be buying ONE now, then possibly adding a 2nd card later for Crossfire)? Or do I just need to bite the bullet and pay closer to $200 for one of those 4870s?
So for my money (less than $200), I'm looking at one of these 4870's:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/...2801%2CN82E16814102825
versus a 4770:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814150366
If I want to play FPS at 1920x1200, will the $109 HD 4770 stand a chance (I'd only be buying ONE now, then possibly adding a 2nd card later for Crossfire)? Or do I just need to bite the bullet and pay closer to $200 for one of those 4870s?