• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

For those ATOT members that celebrate either Boxing Day and/or Kwanzaa...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Ron Karenga (aka Dr. Maulana Ron Karenga) invented the seven-day feast (Dec. 26-Jan. 1) in 1966, branding it a black alternative to Christmas.

How does that relate to: "Why can't blacks celebrate Christmas? Sounds like a racist holiday to me. (Kwanzaa that is)" ?

Info for those who don't realize what stormfront is, or what they're about.

What could be more upsetting than finding out that the site at URL <[url]www.martinlutherking.org> is actually a hate site operated by white supremacists? How about finding a link to it posted by a middle school teacher who assumes the site is a valid source of information about King?[/url]
 
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Spudd
Why that link is bunk.

The article was not written for that site, they are just mirroring it and happened to be the first Googled site to still be hosting it. 😛

Point is who's hosting it and its veracity. History Channel Info

Actually, it isn't. Your link did not dispute the article, because they couldn't. They just pulled the old, "Look, the article is being hosted my wackos, therefore they must be lying." schtick.


rolleye.gif

no smart come back possible huh?
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Spudd
Why that link is bunk.

The article was not written for that site, they are just mirroring it and happened to be the first Googled site to still be hosting it. 😛

Point is who's hosting it and its veracity. History Channel Info

Actually, it isn't. Your link did not dispute the article, because they couldn't. They just pulled the old, "Look, the article is being hosted my wackos, therefore they must be lying." schtick.


rolleye.gif

no smart come back possible huh?

No, in case you didn't see it I edited the response-- go troll somewhere else.
 
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Spudd
Why that link is bunk.

The article was not written for that site, they are just mirroring it and happened to be the first Googled site to still be hosting it. 😛

Point is who's hosting it and its veracity. History Channel Info

Actually, it isn't. Your link did not dispute the article, because they couldn't. They just pulled the old, "Look, the article is being hosted my wackos, therefore they must be lying." schtick.


rolleye.gif

no smart come back possible huh?

No, in case you didn't see it I edited the response-- go troll somewhere else.


so even you decided your only response was inadequate, and decided to hide behind an emoticon🙂
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Spudd
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Spudd
Why that link is bunk.

The article was not written for that site, they are just mirroring it and happened to be the first Googled site to still be hosting it. 😛

Point is who's hosting it and its veracity. History Channel Info

Actually, it isn't. Your link did not dispute the article, because they couldn't. They just pulled the old, "Look, the article is being hosted my wackos, therefore they must be lying." schtick.


rolleye.gif

no smart come back possible huh?

No, in case you didn't see it I edited the response-- go troll somewhere else.


so even you decided your only response was inadequate, and decided to hide behind an emoticon🙂

No, I didn't want what I said to be taken out of context as a personal attack. Why are you so interested in my response? Perhaps you like pushing people's buttons? Trolling? Other motives? You ignored the rest of my posts and links, the fact that he never responded to my last post, but skip to the emoticon? Hmm...
 
Back
Top