For the style challenged: Monthly fashionable clothing subscription for $69/month

Status
Not open for further replies.

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
http://www.bombfell.com/

•Every clothing item is $69. Only pay if you keep it.
•Pay nothing if you return it. Shipping is always free.


lol.. perfect for ATOT.
and since we're all 1%'ers here, the price is chump change.

but we're also Rossman Grand Nagus worshipers too.
What would GotApex say?
 

Imp

Lifer
Feb 8, 2000
18,828
184
106
I was going to shit all over it, but I'm impressed...

Seriously, you fail if you can't just go to the Gap/BR with a 40% coupon and buy something you like.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,439
33,028
136
That's well over my total monthly clothes budget. If I discount shoes/boots then $69/month is more than twice my monthly clothes budget.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,587
17,636
126
I still don't understand. If I am style challenged, how would my judgement on how this item of clothing looks on me be reliable?
 

Meractik

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2003
1,752
0
0
$69 for ONE item = rip-off maybe if the items where packaged together aka 1 pair pants 1 shirt together, with some socks or something... but $69 for just one item is ridiculous.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,587
17,636
126
$69 for ONE item = rip-off maybe if the items where packaged together aka 1 pair pants 1 shirt together, with some socks or something... but $69 for just one item is ridiculous.

Consulting fee duh.
 

Imp

Lifer
Feb 8, 2000
18,828
184
106
$69 for ONE item = rip-off maybe if the items where packaged together aka 1 pair pants 1 shirt together, with some socks or something... but $69 for just one item is ridiculous.

Ya, I did the survey thing and they probably just buy shit from the stores you choose in "where do you shop".

If you choose Gap/BR or J.Crew, I can probably get you something "stylish" each and every month for $30 using either a 40% off coupon or raiding the clearance/sale rack.

Pay me mofos. I do for you too...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.