MrPickins
Diamond Member
- May 24, 2003
- 9,125
- 792
- 126
Yes I am in a rut and thank you for your concern.
What really pisses me off is how my exwife can lie to the kids. If you tell someone something long enough they start to believe it.
No matter how much I love my kids and try to spend time with them, they spent most of their time with my ex. My crazy exwife who would go into screaming rage fits played a large roll in shaping their opinions.
First she gets the kids, then she gets half of everything you worked for, then she poisons the kids minds. When the kids will not have anything to do with you, your ex talks to the kids about having their "new" daddy adopt them. I never had a problem with adoption threats as my greedy exwife loved the child support payments.
In the long run dads get screwed out of having a relationship with the kids, screwed over with child support, emotionally devastated and for what? Because we were "supposed" to get married and have kids?
With the interent young men see the problems older men go through. Young men say no way am I going there. So they decide not to get married or have kids. Good for them. Save yourself the heartache and money.
Its fair so long as you ignore the part about his wife cheating on him while he is deployed in the military.
I guess by your logic those Middle Eastern countries that stick rapists and rape victims in jail for fornication have perfectly "fair" laws as well.![]()
As long as gays can't marry, then it stays sacred and keeps the 'traditional' definition, though.![]()
I feel for you.
Stories like that and we wonder why less men want to get married? The law is tilted against us.
Woman wants child support, she gets a free lawyer.
Man wants to see his kids, we have to hire a lawyer.
That was then and this is now.
I wanted kids, a lot of kids. We only had 4 while I wanted a couple of more.
My ex had her tubes tied after the birth of our 4th besides my objection. Then she gets mad when I leave her?
My exwife had to pay me $300/month in child support until she lost her job. You guys are marrying (and divorcing) the wrong women.![]()
I have a friend, with a simalar situation as mine, except, his son ended up coming to live with him a few years after they split.... he still pays child support, if he didn't, it's a freaking felony! "criminal unsupport."
He should seek legal custody of his son and then the child support requirement would go away.
You do realize the same people that pushed normalizing divorce and having bastard children are the most ardent supporters of same-sex marriage right?
Did your wife go to jail when she could not make her payments?
Uh,, yea.
When the child support office is representing a woman they are like a meat grinder.
When the child support finds out a man has custody, they turn into a wet noodle.
No, but I didn't get the law involved. In fact I told her not to pay me until she got back on her feet. She eventually took a lower paying job and got the support more or less eliminated, I didn't fight it. You would probably consider her a feminist. She's well educated and has a career. Maybe someone like that has a different outlook vs. a woman who feels she is just supposed to be at home dropping out babies on command.
So much for women having to support their kids huh?
What do you expect when the government passes laws that favor women? Why would anyone want to pay alimony until their ex-spouse remarries, or get ran through the child support meat grinder?
If I was 20 years old again, I would never get married or have kids.
Screw having to spend thousands on a divorce, or $10K+ to fight to even see your kids. Save yourself the heartache and never get married or have kids.
Income inequality plays a roll in fewer children being born.
During a recession birthrates drop. Look at Russia, they have a negative birthrate. In Russia more people are dying than being born.
The womens rights movement has played a roll in decreased birthrates. Staying home and raising kids is looked down upon by femenist.
Grow up. Boohoo, you had a bad first marriage. Move on.
Yes I am in a rut and thank you for your concern.
What really pisses me off is how my exwife can lie to the kids. If you tell someone something long enough they start to believe it.
No matter how much I love my kids and try to spend time with them, they spent most of their time with my ex. My crazy exwife who would go into screaming rage fits played a large roll in shaping their opinions.
First she gets the kids, then she gets half of everything you worked for, then she poisons the kids minds. When the kids will not have anything to do with you, your ex talks to the kids about having their "new" daddy adopt them. I never had a problem with adoption threats as my greedy exwife loved the child support payments.
In the long run dads get screwed out of having a relationship with the kids, screwed over with child support, emotionally devastated and for what? Because we were "supposed" to get married and have kids?
I wanted kids, a lot of kids. We only had 4 while I wanted a couple of more.
Besides my objection my ex had her tubes tied after the birth of our 4th. Then she gets mad when I leave her?
Been through 2 divorces in my life, one before I was 2, and one 2 years ago. It's a bitch and my sister has to live with it, too. D:
She squirted out four puppies for you, count yourself lucky; some couples try for years and never have any or pay five figures or more just to have one.
I find it hard to believe that she had her tubes tied without your knowledge and/or agreement.
It's pretty funny that just when gay's start getting the right to marry, straight people are giving it up.
So I take it you don't really have a clue.
How many kids do YOU have?
Just look at the single center minded dolts that post in here.
Let me guess, not only have you never owned a home, never had a drivers license, but you also have never been married?
You do realize that knowledge and agreement are 2 radically different things right?
Its actually not funny at all. Destruction of marriage as a valuable societal institution is pretty much a prerequisite for same-sex marriage to make any kind of sense at all.
Notably the state does not argue that recognizing same-sex marriage undermines conventional marriage.