• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Food stamp use is on rise across U.S.

GrGr

Diamond Member

StL Today

...

Since 2000, Gray and more than 6 million other Americans have joined the ranks of the families who find it increasingly difficult to perform a most basic function - to put food on their tables.

The economic indicators are numerous.

After a seven-year decline, the number of Americans on food stamps has shot up 39 percent since 2000, according to federal statistics. Every state, except Hawaii, has felt the impact. In Arizona, food stamp rolls have increased 104 percent, in Nevada, 97 percent; Oregon, 79 percent; South Carolina, 68 percent; Missouri, 65 percent.

Texas has added nearly a million people to its food stamp rolls in only four years.

Part of that increase was fueled by states' increased efforts to enroll a greater portion of people eligible for food stamps and the placement of people back onto the rolls who were knocked off during welfare reform. Most of it, however, social workers say, is the growing number of Americans unable to feed themselves without help.

"Clearly, most of this is because of increased need," said Carol Adams, head of the Illinois Department of Social Services. Illinois has seen a 31 percent increase in the number of people on food stamps since 2000.

Food banks see increased demand

Meanwhile, the nation's network of food banks and food pantries say they are under intense pressure to meet the demand of hungry families, nearly half of them working.

"We don't have enough hours in the day to serve everybody who comes in," said John Holmer, executive director of Metro Caring, a Denver food pantry that last year served 34,000 people, half of whom were children.

At the Circle of Concern in Valley Park, executive director Glen Koenen said that last month, the pantry served more than 1,200 families, far beyond the pantry's capacity of 750 it established two years ago.

America's Second Harvest, the nation's largest private network of food providers, served 23 million Americans in 2001, 6 million more than the federal food stamp program, according to an independent study.

With demand increasing at food pantries around the country as much as 10 percent, 20 percent, even 40 percent annually, the network is still probably serving more than the federal government, said Doug O'Brien, vice president for public policy and research for the organization.

The families come to the pantries for the same reasons as Gray. By the time they pay the bills - housing, utilities, gas, clothes, prescription drugs - there is little or no money left for food.

"It's hard, but when you have kids, you swallow your pride," said Gray, as she waited to see a counselor at Circle of Concern.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced in November than 36.3 million Americans, more than one of every 10, is at risk of hunger. That figure was the highest number the agency has recorded since it began keeping a tally in 1995.

The changing face of hunger in the U.S.

What is driving those numbers is a convergence of three economic realities, realities that have changed the nature of hunger in America, say economists, social workers and those who help the needy.

etc.

...


 
The sad thing is, many of the people in the poorest regions of the country - the midwest, appalachia, latinos in southern florida, all voted for Bush out of 'moral' reasons.

Screw them - they voted the guy in, they approve of his methods. How many starving people are there in Mass. and N.E in general, N.Y, and Cali, relative to Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana? Median property values speak for themselves.
 
Look at all the bums in those RED states taking handouts...

Tsk tsk tsk...

(and why aren't they working five or six jobs? LAZY BUMS!)
 
Welfare programs are funded by the states, not the national government.

Only social security and medicare are national programs.

Your arguments are invalid unless specifically refering to Social Security or Medicare.
 
food stamps = free food for the bums, got no problem with that. keep them alive, they maybe useful in the future for cheap labors.
 
Originally posted by: RobCur
food stamps = free food for the bums, got no problem with that. keep them alive, they maybe useful in the future for cheap labors.


Don't forget about the cannon fodder! :thumbsup:😀
 
I love the fact that I point out a fallacy in the foundation of this argument and noone bothers to respond to it

LOL ignorance is bliss I guess.
 
Originally posted by: cougarls88
Don't forget about the cannon fodder!

free is good, there's so much food in the market anyway. I would get too fat eating most of it myself so better if a bums helps to eat some. helps me to lose weight as well 🙂
 
I suppose the bunch of you 'blue staters' would be 100% behind a Kerry plan to help the 'red staters', huh? I mean your caring for the welfare of your fellow citizens is just shining through in this thread. But I suppose since their vote didn't coincide with yours they don't matter.
 
Originally posted by: yllus
I suppose the bunch of you 'blue staters' would be 100% behind a Kerry plan to help the 'red staters', huh? I mean your caring for the welfare of your fellow citizens is just shining through in this thread. But I suppose since their vote didn't coincide with yours they don't matter.

More like how can this be??? You Red State RRR FLL's insisted before the Election and still insist that wages are going up so how can this be happening at all??? 😕
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: yllus
I suppose the bunch of you 'blue staters' would be 100% behind a Kerry plan to help the 'red staters', huh? I mean your caring for the welfare of your fellow citizens is just shining through in this thread. But I suppose since their vote didn't coincide with yours they don't matter.

More like how can this be??? You Red State RRR FLL's insisted before the Election and still insist that wages are going up so how can this be happening at all??? 😕
Haha. I live in a red state. That's a laugh riot. 😀

Your reply perfectly illustrates what I've said. No constructive talk, no reaching out, or gathering of minds across the political spectrum to hammer out objectives for America in the new millenium. You'd rather believe that the voters who made those states go red are all "RRR FLL's" who, what...aren't worth reasoning with?

Your country's "left" needs you to listen, talk in earnest, and avoid the moronic labels that you've grown so fond of. Otherwise you're just going to help the "RRR FLL's" have their ways as the point out people like you as those who have a lot to whine about but nothing to lead with.
 
Originally posted by: Centinel
Welfare programs are funded by the states, not the national government.

Only social security and medicare are national programs.

Your arguments are invalid unless specifically refering to Social Security or Medicare.

Whose arguments were you talking about?

The fact that welfare programs are funded by states has nothing to do with what I read.

They were just saying that Red state voters typically talk about not giving handouts to people, when it turns out that most handout recipients are red state voters.
 
Originally posted by: beer
The sad thing is, many of the people in the poorest regions of the country - the midwest, appalachia, latinos in southern florida, all voted for Bush out of 'moral' reasons.

Screw them - they voted the guy in, they approve of his methods. How many starving people are there in Mass. and N.E in general, N.Y, and Cali, relative to Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana? Median property values speak for themselves.

Werd I say cut all federal taxes. Us rich blue states can easily take care of our inner city problem then, instead proping farmers and trialer trash in the midwest.

Rural electricity gone. Rural water gone. Rural postal, gone unless you want to pay $4.00 a letter. etc etc

Oh and all the hillbilly republicans that get to go the .mil for thier jobs program. Well If we slash federal taxes most of those opportunities will disappear too.

Happy holidays😀

Mayeb there's a method to Bush's madness (he is a nothern blue blood after all)😉
 
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: yllus
I suppose the bunch of you 'blue staters' would be 100% behind a Kerry plan to help the 'red staters', huh? I mean your caring for the welfare of your fellow citizens is just shining through in this thread. But I suppose since their vote didn't coincide with yours they don't matter.

More like how can this be??? You Red State RRR FLL's insisted before the Election and still insist that wages are going up so how can this be happening at all??? 😕
Haha. I live in a red state. That's a laugh riot. 😀

Your reply perfectly illustrates what I've said. No constructive talk, no reaching out, or gathering of minds across the political spectrum to hammer out objectives for America in the new millenium. You'd rather believe that the voters who made those states go red are all "RRR FLL's" who, what...aren't worth reasoning with?

Your country's "left" needs you to listen, talk in earnest, and avoid the moronic labels that you've grown so fond of. Otherwise you're just going to help the "RRR FLL's" have their ways as the point out people like you as those who have a lot to whine about but nothing to lead with.

Precisely the point. With folks completely brainwashed by "Morality" you can't reason with them.

Don't have an answer yet to get through to them. It's more like they are taking over what is left of the Country. Good for them, bad for the Country but so what, it will be invaded and renamed to some Islamic name anyway. They'll pray and beg for the President to save them but have no will to fight. Oh well, they get what they deserve.

 
I think my point is very relevant.

I hear nothing but rants about the "blue" states supporting the "red" states because apparently all us dumb idjits down here are on welfare.

My point is that welfare is a state program, and recieves little, if any, federal funding.

Most of the money that the blue states are complaining so much about goes to infrastructure improvement and education.....oh and dont forget all the pork.

Granted I have a major problem with pork projects, but to imply that all southerners are stupid welfare rats is a bit simplistic at the least, and totally assinine at the worst.
 
Originally posted by: Centinel
I think my point is very relevant.

I hear nothing but rants about the "blue" states supporting the "red" states because apparently all us dumb idjits down here are on welfare.

My point is that welfare is a state program, and recieves little, if any, federal funding.

Most of the money that the blue states are complaining so much about goes to infrastructure improvement and education.....oh and dont forget all the pork.

Granted I have a major problem with pork projects, but to imply that all southerners are stupid welfare rats is a bit simplistic at the least, and totally assinine at the worst.

I don't know why people complain about AFDC at all. It's a measley 1% of the federal budget. Not to much to pay IMO for some social insurance for children who really can't pick thier parents and can't work either. What are we going to do throw them on the streets like children in mexico? You wanna see a hard core repulican become a welfare avocate? Just wait till dirty little children are pan handling outside his palm beach resort.

Anyway, cutting welfare and food stamps won't even make a dent on the debt it's the real beloved fat projects that are bankrupting us that need some mettle to tackle. Anyone can pick on poor people who don't vote and thier children.
 
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: yllus
I suppose the bunch of you 'blue staters' would be 100% behind a Kerry plan to help the 'red staters', huh? I mean your caring for the welfare of your fellow citizens is just shining through in this thread. But I suppose since their vote didn't coincide with yours they don't matter.

More like how can this be??? You Red State RRR FLL's insisted before the Election and still insist that wages are going up so how can this be happening at all??? 😕
Haha. I live in a red state. That's a laugh riot. 😀

Your reply perfectly illustrates what I've said. No constructive talk, no reaching out, or gathering of minds across the political spectrum to hammer out objectives for America in the new millenium. You'd rather believe that the voters who made those states go red are all "RRR FLL's" who, what...aren't worth reasoning with?

Your country's "left" needs you to listen, talk in earnest, and avoid the moronic labels that you've grown so fond of. Otherwise you're just going to help the "RRR FLL's" have their ways as the point out people like you as those who have a lot to whine about but nothing to lead with.




In all honesty I think it is best that the moderate democrats and the right should go their seprate ways for a bit until the right gets a bit more centrist.
There is such a polar oppisite right now and the right has such complete anger twoard "liberals" it's going to be awhile. The left needs to go left IMO and do some serious soul searching about the fundamental values of the party. Kerry was a big letdown. I heard almost nothing mainstream left from him just kinda agreeing with bush. That is bad as far as I am concerned. You can't win elections ignoring the big issues and running someone "cuz hes not the other guy"
Kerry never even laid down the democrats main issue -the war...
It's starting to look like a 1 party state to anyone a bit left of the center.
Both parties have exellent points but I think they have been ignored over wedge issues.



I am going to get flamed by the libertarians for this but:
Food stamps are yummy! I wish I could get them, I work full time and so does my woman and we still eat ramen. With the taxes they take it'd be nice to have a good meal once a week or so without having to kill some other part of the budget. :|
Burritos Not Bombs!!!!! <--- new sig someone has a flag with this in their window down the street and it rules.
 
Back
Top