IceBergSLiM
Lifer
- Jul 11, 2000
- 29,932
- 3
- 81
They don't need to put HFCS in absolutely everything. The simplest solution would be to reformulate your recipe to so it doesn't contain obscene quantities of an unnecessary ingredient.
Weather forecaster are predicting the summer of 2012 to be just as bad as 2011. If that prediction is true, we can expect food prices to keep going up for the next 2 years.
Do you have a handy link about the summer of 2012?
The local news station was talking about the 2012 summer predictions last night, but I did not find anything on their website.
Here is another link that says what I heard last night
http://www.kob.com/article/stories/S2232886.shtml
The weather people base their predictions on el nina and el nino. During one cycle the south gets rain, during the other cycle we get drought.
Thanks for the link. Another year of this drought is the last thing we need.
It is an effective fuel, you are just plain wrong there. You can only find one scientist that says otherwise and that scientist uses 40 year old production data ignoring any gains that were made since the 1970s.
You are correct that it isn't particularly environmentally friendly.
As for using the land, that is a farmer's choice. Free markets tend to do that. Or, are you arguing the government should step in and order farmers to go against their will?
Talk about a non-newsworthy story.
I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter
This is why I'm serious when I tell my wife I can't wait for her to finish school so she can become an RN in about 3 years. Then with her additional income, we'll live just as good as we do today.
You hope. It's possible that three years from now the nursing field could be saturated or the hospitals will have just filled all of their positions with subservient low-wage Filipino nurses. Also, if the rest of the nation's economy goes down the tubes, nurses and other people in the medical fields will be affected.
Don't buy fattening products with HFCS in it and you won't be affected.
Very true. When I think about the sheer number of people currently in nursing programs, the idea that the medical industry will be able to continue to absorb all of these new RNs seems unlikely.
I would imagine that pay scales and employment for nurses is likely to see a significant deterioration in the near future. The only thing I can see saving them is the continuing offloading of responsibilities of expensive doctors to nursing personnel, but that also can only last for so long.
It is an effective fuel, you are just plain wrong there. You can only find one scientist that says otherwise and that scientist uses 40 year old production data ignoring any gains that were made since the 1970s.
You are correct that it isn't particularly environmentally friendly.
As for using the land, that is a farmer's choice. Free markets tend to do that. Or, are you arguing the government should step in and order farmers to go against their will?
It is an effective fuel, you are just plain wrong there. You can only find one scientist that says otherwise and that scientist uses 40 year old production data ignoring any gains that were made since the 1970s.
You are correct that it isn't particularly environmentally friendly.
As for using the land, that is a farmer's choice. Free markets tend to do that. Or, are you arguing the government should step in and order farmers to go against their will?
Really?Ethanol increases wear on engines
Why does volumetric energy density matter?and is far less efficient than gasoline (takes more to go the same distance).
Really?
Why does volumetric energy density matter?
Octane isn't energy.Yes really, it doesn't have near the lubricating capability.
It has a lot less octane.
So a car that gets 25 mpg on reg gas will only get something like 18 on corn.
Great, now we have another thread that Dave can provide daily updates on food prices as well as people being carded when purchasing vinegar.
Ethanol increases wear on engines and is far less efficient than gasoline (takes more to go the same distance).
And, I really, really hope you're not trying to claim that farming is in any way shape or form a free market. (What I'm saying is that farming subsidies need to stop. That would bring the cost of corn and meat down faster than any other possible policy the government could enact, short of a price ceiling.)
What I'm saying is that farming subsidies need to stop.
lol, it only took 3 posts after yours for your prediction to come true.
