• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Food for thought:

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
If someone is a vegitarian on the grounds of animal cruelty, would they eat meat if it could be proven that the animal died of natural causes?

This came up in a conversation today ... made me curious.

Whaddya think?

Scott
 
If they want to stay consistent and not backpedal on the issue, then logically they should have no problems eating meat of that nature.
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
what about road kill? that was an accidental death, no intentional cruelty per se
Not exactly on topic, but I read one article a long time ago about how these tree-huggers wanted to put little conduit pieces under some long trail in the eastern US, because too many snails were getting squished by hikers' boots. They never did explain how they were intending to teach the snails to use the conduit, however.
rolleye.gif


BTW, nice thread title. Pun intended or no? 😉
 
Back
Top