Folding@Home: 24 hour stats - December 1, 2007

[GLeeM]

Folding@Home TeAm #198

Welcome to the TeAm, jonesthewino & caferace 🙂 If you have any questions or need any help, just ask.


The TeAm is in 23rd place! 😀

Join us in the drive for 22nd place! While helping find cures for diseases!

Points
Total_______ 80,424,902
24hr Avg______ 161,200
Last 24hr______ 170,731 :shocked:

Active Users_____ 231
Avg PPD________ 697.8

Overtakes 😀
p2p-community__________ 1.2 years
ABXZone.com ___________ 2.6 years
DSL Reports Team Helix ___ 2.6 years
Dutch Power Cows________ 9.5 years

Threats 🙁
Overclock.net ____________ 4.4 months
2ch@PS3 ________________ 6.8 months
OcUK __________________ 11.8 months
PlayStation.com Team _____ 2.0 years
Team 2ch _______________ 4.1 years


Todays Milestone Makers :thumbsup:

clicq ________________ 50,000
landwing ____________ 10,000
GenHoth _____________ 2,500
Leth's PS3 ____________ 2,500

Neurodog ____________ Top 200
sam1080 ____________ Top 250


Top 30 Producers

__ Points in last 7 days
1 ___ 93,500 ___ MarkF_Williams
2 ___ 85,904 ___ MadMurph
3 ___ 72,610 ___ scottv67
4 ___ 39,961 ___ jdiddy
5 ___ 38,977 ___ ripship
6 ___ 35,765 ___ XPBLACKDRAGON
7 ___ 29,170 ___ Neurodog
8 ___ 24,912 ___ HurricaneAndrew
9 ___ 23,909 ___ Athlex
10 __ 20,466 ___ Uppsala9496
11 __ 18,179 ___ phw
12 __ 17,763 ___ biodoc
13 __ 17,600 ___ ishould
14 __ 17,564 ___ Insidious
15 __ 17,218 ___ Gravity
16 __ 16,762 ___ GLeeM
17 __ 15,998 ___ o080o
18 __ 14,882 ___ xbassman
19 __ 14,129 ___ TurtleBlue
20 __ 13,156 ___ mike9o
21 __ 12,246 ___ Bunker
22 __ 11,300 ___ jimmys3
23 __ 10,658 ___ Phaxmohdem
24 __ 10,552 ___ DavidBoaz
25 __ 10,480 ___ fhonyotski
26 ___ 9,883 ___ Desslok
27 ___ 9,308 ___ mgpaulus
28 ___ 8,800 ___ xfalconx2
29 ___ 8,800 ___ Cutthroat
30 ___ 8,368 ___ mooseracing


These 135 sent results in the last 24 hours:

__TeAm Rank__Points_____Name
1 ______ 2 __ 17,600 ____ MarkF_Williams
2 _____ 23 __ 12,219 ____ MadMurph
3 ______ 8 __ 10,738 ____ scottv67
4 ____ 194 ___ 6,704 ____ Neurodog
5 _____ 33 ___ 6,439 ____ jdiddy
6 _____ 47 ___ 5,780 ____ phw
7 _____ 22 ___ 5,445 ____ ripship
8 _____ 26 ___ 4,020 ____ o080o
9 _____ 18 ___ 3,858 ____ Insidious
10 _____ 5 ___ 3,840 ____ GLeeM
11 ____ 13 ___ 3,520 ____ Uppsala9496
12 _____ 7 ___ 3,052 ____ HurricaneAndrew
13 ____ 14 ___ 2,476 ____ mike9o
14 ___ 129 ___ 2,409 ____ Phaxmohdem
15 ___ 184 ___ 2,354 ____ biodoc
16 _____ 1 ___ 2,318 ____ Gravity
17 _____ 4 ___ 2,201 ____ Athlex
18 _____ 6 ___ 2,098 ____ Sniderhouse
19 ____ 32 ___ 1,966 ____ XPBLACKDRAGON
20 ____ 59 ___ 1,944 ____ TurtleBlue
21 ____ 19 ___ 1,791 ____ mgpaulus
22 ____ 39 ___ 1,760 ____ GSmith
23 ____ 89 ___ 1,760 ____ ishould
24 ___ 118 ___ 1,760 ____ Cutthroat
25 ___ 308 ___ 1,760 ____ mooseracing
26 ___ 516 ___ 1,760 ____ landwing
27 ___ 480 ___ 1,742 ____ blert
28 ____ 37 ___ 1,556 ____ DavidBoaz
29 ____ 97 ___ 1,555 ____ Desslok
30 ____ 87 ___ 1,453 ____ jimmys3
31 ___ 112 ___ 1,404 ____ SilverSurfer042677
32 ___ 593 ___ 1,390 ____ chaos22
33 ____ 36 ___ 1,372 ____ Zensal
34 ____ 46 ___ 1,345 ____ fhonyotski
35 ____ 11 ___ 1,304 ____ bastula
36 ____ 35 ___ 1,205 ____ JoshLiechty
37 ___ 198 ___ 1,198 ____ Creig
38 ___ 263 ___ 1,129 ____ dowxp
39 ___ 272 ___ 1,029 ____ cooldadd
40 ___ 216 ___ 1,000 ____ epc
41 ___ 857 ___ 1,000 ____ rabrittain
42 ___ 494 ____ 985 ____ jonesthewine
43 ____ 71 ____ 975 ____ MasterChef
44 ___ 307 ____ 940 ____ Deyer
45 ___ 720 ____ 940 ____ pmoa
46 ___ 105 ____ 935 ____ PS3tedfishr
47 ___ 806 ____ 896 ____ Leth'sPS3
48 ___ 293 ____ 887 ____ Extelleron
49 ___ 148 ____ 872 ____ vigneron
50 ____ 77 ____ 843 ____ Nacelle
51 ___ 146 ____ 837 ____ CCrunner84
52 ___ 332 ____ 811 ____ KBERK
53 ___ 211 ____ 798 ____ PS3ojg
54 ____ 78 ____ 792 ____ brainwrinkle
55 ____ 83 ____ 755 ____ TheTerl
56 ___ 663 ____ 740 ____ bjparker
57 ____ 79 ____ 736 ____ JHutch2000
58 ____ 17 ____ 706 ____ PokeyTA
59 ____ 60 ____ 682 ____ abel007
60 ____ 54 ____ 681 ____ Ruffilb
61 ___ 107 ____ 674 ____ ChrisHuff
62 ___ 375 ____ 660 ____ Schadenfroh
63 ___ 440 ____ 660 ____ VikingDude151
64 ____ 66 ____ 627 ____ DainBramaged
65 ___ 384 ____ 600 ____ ShawnD1
66 ___ 231 ____ 589 ____ clicq
67 ___ 223 ____ 544 ____ zacharygthomas
68 ____ 61 ____ 529 ____ Antero
69 _____ 9 ____ 500 ____ CupCak3
70 ____ 41 ____ 500 ____ TeAmDeception.Net
71 ____ 49 ____ 500 ____ jkresh
72 ____ 70 ____ 500 ____ MadAmos
73 ____ 90 ____ 500 ____ deninc66
74 ___ 133 ____ 500 ____ Jeff7
75 ___ 202 ____ 500 ____ jbubrisk
76 ___ 329 ____ 500 ____ LetsGoPreds
77 ___ 414 ____ 500 ____ Steve
78 ___ 828 ____ 500 ____ GenHoth
79 ____ 10 ____ 498 ____ MartinTrevino
80 ___ 340 ____ 412 ____ Konranjyoutai
81 ___ 273 ____ 392 ____ dissent
82 ___ 167 ____ 372 ____ kart17wins
83 ____ 40 ____ 371 ____ stevty2889
84 ____ 44 ____ 343 ____ Lnx227
85 ____ 62 ____ 343 ____ PeterBarriga
86 ___ 208 ____ 343 ____ herm0016
87 ___ 225 ____ 343 ____ aLeoN
88 ___ 345 ____ 343 ____ Ionoxx
89 ___ 410 ____ 343 ____ Netxen
90 ___ 493 ____ 343 ____ Liberia
91 ___ 922 ____ 343 ____ phatcow
92 __ 1,204 ___ 343 ____ jonesthewino
93 ___ 114 ____ 338 ____ zerocool1
94 ___ 479 ____ 338 ____ salvorhardin
95 ___ 175 ____ 330 ____ soydios
96 ___ 565 ____ 314 ____ lookouthere
97 ___ 159 ____ 295 ____ jedeyenite
98 ____ 16 ____ 292 ____ xbassman
99 ___ 220 ____ 292 ____ pkrush
100 __ 943 ____ 287 ____ ltspongebob
101 __ 456 ____ 250 ____ Bryon
102 __ 227 ____ 230 ____ Icondog
103 ___ 94 ____ 226 ____ jtmiller
104 __ 100 ____ 225 ____ Vexx
105 __ 259 ____ 220 ____ seanc85
106 ___ 45 ____ 218 ____ kravahn
107 __ 187 ____ 218 ____ PunjabiPlaya
108 __ 372 ____ 218 ____ NumbersGuy
109 ___ 63 ____ 217 ____ HappyCracker
110 __ 109 ____ 206 ____ Imzjustplayin
111 __ 120 ____ 206 ____ futuristicmonkey
112 ___ 25 ____ 193 ____ dawks-rawks
113 __ 441 ____ 192 ____ f4phantom2500
114 ___ 29 ____ 186 ____ Thump553
115 ___ 68 ____ 186 ____ sparkyclarky
116 ___ 81 ____ 186 ____ Sparks
117 __ 106 ____ 186 ____ Kryai
118 __ 177 ____ 186 ____ Cuhulainn
119 __ 255 ____ 186 ____ hoeser
120 __ 313 ____ 186 ____ tooker
121 __ 322 ____ 186 ____ Brazos
122 __ 391 ____ 186 ____ AaronLowe
123 __ 581 ____ 186 ____ dlhuang
124 __ 912 ____ 186 ____ tomiko
125 ___ 86 ____ 174 ____ maluman
126 __ 250 ____ 174 ____ sam1080
127 __ 464 ____ 174 ____ jerryossa
128 __ 490 ____ 174 ____ ghostcow
129 __ 492 ____ 174 ____ wilL
130 _ 1,066 ___ 174 ____ PhillipDoede
131 ___ 65 ____ 165 ____ AndrewMedley
132 __ 350 _____ 69 ____ mchan1
133 __ 121 _____ 11 ____ Overkiller
134 __ 130 ______ 9 ____ wurkfur
135 _ 1,593 _____ 2 ____ caferace


Todays Climbers

Steps__Name
127 __ rabrittain
80 ___ Leth's_PS3
60 ___ phatcow
59 ___ Phillip_Doede
54 ___ pmoa
48 ___ ltspongebob
42 ___ chaos22
40 ___ GenHoth
26 ___ landwing
25 ___ blert
24 ___ bjparker
19 ___ jonesthewine
14 ___ tomiko
13 ___ mooseracing
8 ____ Neurodog
8 ____ cooldadd
7 ____ Deyer
6 ____ LetsGoPreds
6 ____ VikingDude151
6 ____ lookouthere
5 ____ KBERK
5 ____ Schadenfroh
5 ____ dlhuang
4 ____ biodoc
4 ____ ShawnD1
4 ____ Steve
3 ____ PS3ojg
3 ____ Icondog
3 ____ dissent
3 ____ Ionoxx
3 ____ salvorhardin
3 ____ Liberia
2 ____ phw
2 ____ SilverSurfer042677
2 ____ clicq
2 ____ seanc85
2 ____ dowxp
2 ____ Extelleron
2 ____ Konranjyoutai
2 ____ mchan1
2 ____ Aaron_Lowe
1 ____ TeAm_Deception.Net
1 ____ DainBramaged
1 ____ JHutch2000
1 ____ TheTerl
1 ____ Desslok
1 ____ PS3tedfishr
1 ____ Cutthroat
1 ____ Phaxmohdem
1 ____ CCrunner84
1 ____ vigneron
1 ____ kart17wins
1 ____ jbubrisk
1 ____ epc
1 ____ pkrush
1 ____ aLeoN
1 ____ sam1080
1 ____ NumbersGuy
1 ____ Netxen
1 ____ Bryon

Sorry about any slight name differences. Or errors.

Thanks to all who contributed - big and small 😀
And thanks to those who are crunching a WU and will be on the list soon 😉

Folding@Home TeAm #198

MDE's setup guide.

EOC stats

F@H Stats

 

[Insidious]

Last 24hr______ 170,731

Ya gotta love this! :thumbsup:

Thanks for the stats GLeeM!

-Sid

 

[Pokey]

Welcome jonesthewino & caferace 😀
and
Congratulations to the MM's . 😎

Thanks GLeeM. :thumbsup:

 

[Neurodog]

Thanks for the stats.

Lets keet it going teams!

 

[caferace]

Originally posted by: Pokey
Welcome jonesthewino & caferace 😀

It's nice to be in such good company. :beer:

hic.

-jim

 

[Slider76]

awesome effort team, i think the "race" is having a big effect on that score line.
Welcome jonesthewino & caferace
Congrats mm's
Thanks Gleem

 

[biodoc]

Originally posted by: Pokey
Welcome jonesthewino & caferace 😀
and
Congratulations to the MM's . 😎

Thanks GLeeM. :thumbsup:

:thumbsup::beer:

 

[scottv67]

Points
Total_______ 80,424,902
24hr Avg______ 161,200
Last 24hr______ 170,731 :shocked:

I think the TeAm can do better than 170,000 PPD. We just need MFW and MadsMurph to crack open the throttle (or the checkbook) a little more. 😉

These 135 sent results in the last 24 hours:

__TeAm Rank__Points_____Name
1 ______ 2 __ 17,600 ____ MarkF_Williams
2 _____ 23 __ 12,219 ____ MadsMurph

Maybe Santa will leave some Q6600s under the tree for all the good girls and boys on the TeAm. 😀

-s

 

[scottv67]

MarkFW:

I noticed that nearly all of your WUs have been the 1760 pt variety. Are all of of your Folders running the Windows SMP client? How long (in hhmm) does it take for one of your machines to download, crunch and return one of the 1760-pt WUs?

Thanks,
-Scott

 

[Markfw]

Yes, all run the SMP client. Download is immediate, crunch is 13 hours best (3.6 Q6600) to over 2 days for X2 4400@2.5, return is immediate. Having 5 quads makes a difference ! @C2D's (they do it in one day @3.2-3.3)

 

[Insidious]

Mark, Do you run one or two clients on the quad machine?

 

[MadMurph]

Originally posted by: scottv67

Points
Total_______ 80,424,902
24hr Avg______ 161,200
Last 24hr______ 170,731 :shocked:

I think the TeAm can do better than 170,000 PPD.

Amen! Let's get excited when it hits 200K.

Sid - when running SMP client on a quad, there's no benefit to running more than one instance of the client. BTW I think they've written some special code for our contest. I never seen so many EUE's and server problems. I think the F@h boys saw us coming -- guinea pigs (of course, I'm always the first to assume a "conspiracy theory.") If you've got a X1950Pro lying around, you can run the GPU client as a second instance of folding on the same box.

 

[MadMurph]

Originally posted by: scottv67
. . . We just need MFW and MadMurphs to crack open the throttle (or the checkbook) a little more. 😉

. . . and let's try to keep the insane segment of the population in check, eh?

 

[Neurodog]

Originally posted by: MadMurph

Originally posted by: scottv67

Points
Total_______ 80,424,902
24hr Avg______ 161,200
Last 24hr______ 170,731 :shocked:

I think the TeAm can do better than 170,000 PPD.

Amen! Let's get excited when it hits 200K.

Sid - when running SMP client on a quad, there's no benefit to running more than one instance of the client. BTW I think they've written some special code for our contest. I never seen so many EUE's and server problems. I think the F@h boys saw us coming -- guinea pigs (of course, I'm always the first to assume a "conspiracy theory.") If you've got a X1950Pro lying around, you can run the GPU client as a second instance of folding on the same box.

I have a 1900xtx and stopped using it after seeing the SMP performance on my Opteron 165. Would it be worth it to have the GPU client also run? I know it will eat 50% of the CPU when GPU is running.

 

[Insidious]

Originally posted by: Neurodog
I have a 1900xtx and stopped using it after seeing the SMP performance on my Opteron 165. Would it be worth it to have the GPU client also run? I know it will eat 50% of the CPU when GPU is running.

So you know you've now got about 30 of us hoping you are going to try it and let us know if it works out to more combined PPD. I thgink the SMP works out to be better than one regular F@H client + a GPU client..... but I don't remember anyone trying a combo of GPU and SMP on a dual core. The quad core guys are the ones I think might benefit from one SMP and one GPU client. But I have nothing really to base that on except intuition.

:beer:

-Sid

 

[Neurodog]

Originally posted by: Insidious

Originally posted by: Neurodog
I have a 1900xtx and stopped using it after seeing the SMP performance on my Opteron 165. Would it be worth it to have the GPU client also run? I know it will eat 50% of the CPU when GPU is running.

So you know you've now got about 30 of us hoping you are going to try it and let us know if it works out to more combined PPD. I thgink the SMP works out to be better than one regular F@H client + a GPU client..... but I don't remember anyone trying a combo of GPU and SMP on a dual core. The quad core guys are the ones I think might benefit from one SMP and one GPU client. But I have nothing really to base that on except intuition.

:beer:

-Sid

I might try it. I'll just wait till this WU completes. 🙂

 

[Markfw]

I can't install linux on my new 3.610 quad because of the 1 meg S3 video card I put in (low power and heat on a dedicated folding box), so maybe I will put in one of my two X1900xt's and try that ! I know the PPD of the cards, so if it slows down the SMP client, I just trun it off ! If it does work, then I have another box to try it out on also !

 

[scottv67]

MarkFW:

Yes, all run the SMP client. Download is immediate, crunch is 13 hours best (3.6 Q6600) to over 2 days for X2 4400@2.5, return is immediate. Having 5 quads makes a difference ! @C2D's (they do it in one day @3.2-3.3)

Interesting. My Q6600s are running at a slightly lower clock speed than your Quads but my machine are returning SMP WUs in less than 12 hours. The WUs issued to my Fedora Quads are always 1440 points. There seems to be some sort of disparity in the PPD between the Linux SMP client and the Windows SMP client. The Linux SMP client is faster so the Linux SMP WUs are rewarded with fewer points than the Windows SMP client (which is a wee bit slower) (that is my theory).

I haven't run any apples-to-apples comparison tests on my Quads to compare the SMP client on Fedora to the SMP client on Windows to measure PPD on the same hardware.

Mark, have you tried the Linux SMP client on any of your Quads?

If I could force my Quads to download only the 1760-point WUs, I'd be accumulating significantly more PPD. But think there is something on the "server" end that hands the more profitable WUs to the slightly slower client to keep things even between the Linux and Windows SMP clients.

-Scott

 

[biodoc]

Originally posted by: scottv67
MarkFW:

Yes, all run the SMP client. Download is immediate, crunch is 13 hours best (3.6 Q6600) to over 2 days for X2 4400@2.5, return is immediate. Having 5 quads makes a difference ! @C2D's (they do it in one day @3.2-3.3)

If I could force my Quads to download only the 1760-point WUs, I'd be accumulating significantly more PPD. But think there is something on the "server" end that hands the more profitable WUs to the slightly slower client to keep things even between the Linux and Windows SMP clients.

-Scott

My linux quad consistently downloads 1760 WUs. A couple of thing to check in -config: Make sure you chose big WU (>5mb) and also when it asks for RAM to dedicate or something like that, type in 2048 or number of your choice. I read somewhere that if you don't tell the linux client how much RAM you have, it defaults to some low number and thus crunches smaller WUs.

:beer:

 

[petrusbroder]

Thanks for the stats, GLeeM. 😀

I certainly hope that the race will add to the ppd of the TeAm! It would be bad if it would not ... :Q

When do you usually update the stats? I am asking, because today (December 2) @ 3 am, I uploaded my first WU (1760 points). Look here: http://folding.extremeovercloc...ummary.php?s=&u=160496

Not a problem, since the WUs will appear in the next set of numbers, just wondering. 😀

 

[GLeeM]

Originally posted by: MadMurph
Sid - when running SMP client on a quad, there's no benefit to running more than one instance of the client.

Originally posted by: GLeeM

Originally posted by: biodoc
Neurodog is on my tail and closing fast:shocked:

Q6600@2.4GHz
ubuntu 64 bit Linux
project 2653 (Credit 1760)
9 min 30 sec per step🙂

Shut down and OC:

Q6600@3GHz
ubuntu 64 bit Linux
project 2653 (Credit 1760)
7 min 40 sec per step😀

set up 2nd SMP client:

both are 12 min 14 sec per step

Looks like it's worth running 2 SMP clients?

:beer:

7 min 40 sec = 3,306 ppd

12 min 14 sec = 2072 ppd; so times two = 4,144 ppd!!

Is it only on the Linux client that two SMPs does better ppd?

@Peter
So happy for you 😛
And this IS fun!
And we just got over 12 inches of light fluffy snow 😉
Went out to start up snowblower this morning and no gas - first son stole the can!
Second son started to shovel end of driveway so we could go get some gas and stranger with pickup and plow stopped and helped. Driveway was clean five minutes later 😀 What a blessing, even made it to church on time!

Go TAS :thumbsup:

EDIT: seems like I am crossing threads here 😕
@Peter
I do the stats after KakaoStats updates at 8:30 Central USA.

 

[Markfw]

Originally posted by: MadMurph

Originally posted by: scottv67

Points
Total_______ 80,424,902
24hr Avg______ 161,200
Last 24hr______ 170,731 :shocked:

I think the TeAm can do better than 170,000 PPD.

Amen! Let's get excited when it hits 200K.

Sid - when running SMP client on a quad, there's no benefit to running more than one instance of the client. BTW I think they've written some special code for our contest. I never seen so many EUE's and server problems. I think the F@h boys saw us coming -- guinea pigs (of course, I'm always the first to assume a "conspiracy theory.") If you've got a X1950Pro lying around, you can run the GPU client as a second instance of folding on the same box.

I just tried this (SMP + GPU) but I don't recommend it for C2D, only quads.

well, I just fired up the GPU client alongside a SMP client. The times may indicate that I get more PPD that way !

7:40 per step GPU = 660 PPD if I remember correctly

and SMP went from 8:18/step to 8:43 ! Not much effect ! I have a feeling I should do this.

 

[petrusbroder]

LoL, GLeeM! That was a good Sunday!

I wish we had had the "lights and fluffy" snow - then the snowblower would have had a go! 😉

Thanks for the info, BTW! 😀

 

[Insidious]

Thanks to our resident guinea pig MarkFW :beer:

I'm an admitted NVidiot, but to the ATI adjusted, it looks like there are still even more ppd to be had on those brandy new Quads!

-Sid

 

[scottv67]

My linux quad consistently downloads 1760 WUs. A couple of thing to check in -config: Make sure you chose big WU (>5mb) and also when it asks for RAM to dedicate or something like that, type in 2048 or number of your choice. I read somewhere that if you don't tell the linux client how much RAM you have, it defaults to some low number and thus crunches smaller WUs.

Thank you for the tip, biodoc! I will give that a try and report back.

-s