Pipeline 1010
Golden Member
- Dec 2, 2005
- 1,987
- 807
- 136
Haha, touche. I certainly can't argue those points.
The long and the short of the "discussion" Taj and I had was that I just haven't seen any objective evidence that arming teachers will protect students, and the evidence that is out there suggests it may actually be more dangerous. We weren't discussing resource officers.
I absolutely want schools safer, I just do not believe giving teachers guns is the answer.
Thanks for the synopsis. And thanks for not forcing me to slog through Taj posts. I also want schools safer. I don't believe that giving armed, certified, trained teachers is dangerous. We literally call armed, certified, trained people to respond when shootings happen. Why not arm, certify, and train people who are actually at the school and who can respond in real time? I don't care if it is a resource officer, a principal, a teacher, or an adult hall monitor. If they have been trained and certified, then they MAY have the ability to stop a mass murder.
What evidence is there that it might actually be more dangerous? I have not heard of a single incident of a death caused by an armed teacher.
