Flight SIm 2002 anyone?

[Keego]

Has anyone played with this? I had 2000 but I wasn't that impressed, I guess I just like action more... Screenshots would be nice

 

[Ionizer86]

I've tried Flight Sim 95 and now I have Flight Sim 2000. I don't have 2002, but by extrapolating, it's probably boring also. 95 and 2000 were both boring, and they lacked many details in the landscape (all those missing buildings, bridges, etc in cities).

 

[Keego]

here's a snazzy review:
Text

 

[crab]

I've had every MSFS since version 4 plus many more including ~$250 ones....2002 is neat eye-candy wise, but not at all realistic flight deck wise. Add-ons make it alot more realistic.

 

[Cessna172]

I actually hated 2000, but love 2002. 2000 ran so damn slow on my system, but 2002 runs great, even with all the settings maxed out. They really must have tweaked the graphics engine for this version. It's much more efficient. I like the new air traffic control, and the graphics are much better than 2000. I don't know what all the differences are, but just the fact that it actually runs smoothly is a reason to buy it (if you like the FS series, of course).