It's Not Lupus
Senior member
Anyone try these? Any recommendations?
I'll stump for MS and give a vote to my Band. I really like it. It does HR tracking, standalone GPS, a decent smart watch notification interface and an easy to use (if not spartan) companion app for smart phones. I love how I can track my workouts, name them easily, and also break them up by workouts, runs, and daily activity. It also does very good sleep tracking. The website from MS has some very detailed and fun to look at reports that the apps don't have. It was a bit uncomfortable the first few weeks but after 3 months I forget I even have it on. Battery life is ok, you can do 2 days easily without anxiety. GPS will torch it, but that's true for any device of that type. I have a coworker that really stripped down the functions and he can do almost 4 days off the charger. It's a darkhorse in the fitness tracking market and really an interesting device. I'm hopeful that Rev2 really brings some competition to the field.
I stated in my GPS watch thread that I bought the Vivofit2 for my wife. It retails $99 just about everywhere, but has been 20% off in the last month (brief sale).
There are 3 basic types of fitness bands...the step counters and sleep trackers...then there are the GPS watches that track routes and store them to be synced later...then there are smart watches, which are basically just gateways to a smartphone and require apps/gps to run ont he phone.
The GPS ones tend to be more technical if you run or bike. That's what I really wanted...something that would link to runkeeper or strava...then I like those to myfitnesspal and track calorie burning along with distance/pace to see progressions in my workouts.
I know the Vivofit 2 uses Garmin Connect (which can be linked to other fitness apps) and is ANT+ compatible for HRM. The 2 just gives you 1 year of battery life (their claim) if you don't want to worry about charging the thing daily or weekly.
Other watches all seem to require charging every 8 hours, or with less features every few weeks. There are a lot of smart watches that use the phone GPS and link to apps actually running on the phone itself. So be careful if you look at brand-specific watches from companies like Samsung. If you're looking for a cheap smart-watch, read up on compatibility with your favorite apps. The Pebble watch, for instance, is cheap and can do a lot.
The MS Band is about as far into the smart watch category as I'm willing to venture, at least until the AppleWatch 3 (not a sure thing, but I know that I want at least 2-3 days regular use battery life, so I can get a solid 24 hours of serious use out of it [sleep tracking with frequent HRM, workout tracking with constant HRM, etc]).
I'll check out the Vivofit, but at first glance it doesn't appear to have a vibrate motor, and not sure about smart alarms for sleep.
You are correct - the VF (1 and 2) don't have a vibrate motor or alarms for sleep. At the end of the day, just have to decide what features are impt to you. I considered the Jawbones and the Fitbits last year before deciding on the VF1. Don't doubt my decision for a second - love it. The VF2 improved by adding in a backlight, audible alarm, few other features that were missing from the VF1.
Really at the end of the day, just have to ask yourself what features are really impt.
Sleep tracking and silent smart alarms
Heart rate monitoring
I care not at all about step count
If that's what you care about then the VF series is not for you.
The only thing these items can do is measure distance traveled (via gps) and heart rate (via a sensor).
There's nothing else these can do for you. Why do people use them?