Chromagnus
Senior member
This thread seems to be very one sided. Can't believe no one has come in here and tried to defend the "party of fiscal conservatism" yet.
This thread seems to be very one sided. Can't believe no one has come in here and tried to defend the "party of fiscal conservatism" yet.
That long huh?Not sure what anyone expects, how else were the ultra-rich (including many in Congress) supposed to get their big payout--er, pay their "fair" share? Something had to give. Even the GOP couldn't blatantly rip away social programs to fund this windfall (though that may be coming over time, as they rightly count on the moronic public to not be able to stay focussed on issues for more than a couple weeks or so).
This thread seems to be very one sided. Can't believe no one has come in here and tried to defend the "party of fiscal conservatism" yet.
This thread seems to be very one sided. Can't believe no one has come in here and tried to defend the "party of fiscal conservatism" yet.
Way under estimates the actual deficit caused by GWB via the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/21/news/economy/war-costs-afghanistan/index.html