A couple of things...
First is that people are blowing right past part of the policy
statement:
"a $500 limit on receiving credit card payments every six months"
Note that if someone is paying you from a balance in their account,
it doesn't count against you. So if someone is sending you a
$200 payment but has $175 in their account from stuff they sold,
only $25 of your $500 limit is eaten up. Which of course begs
the question: How the f*ck are we supposed to know how we are
being paid??? Without some kind of change to the information we
receive on payment, we'll have no idea.
Further, I'll be d@mned if I'm going to sign for their business
plan and forfeit the transaction fees on the $500 that I'd get
free had I not signed up. Under it's current implementation,
there is no reason to sign up unless forced to do so - they don't
state that they exempt the first $500/6 months. Excuse me if I
don't jump right up and join.
If paypal had to make a change to stay afloat, then I can't hold
it against them. I *can and do* hold it against them that their
changes are poorly thought out (at least from my perspective -
they don't spell out the logic of their changes, near as I can
tell because there is none). Let me sketch that perspective
out a bit.
I'm probably one of the customers that Paypal actually likes.
I tend to leave a $100+ balance in my account for weeks to months
at a time. I've never requested a cash payout from my balance.
I use eb@y/paypal as a way of accumulating "mad money" for lack
of a better term - it funds (mainly) computer upgrades that I
otherwise wouldn't be budgeting/spending money on. When I am
getting close (90%ish) to having enough for what I want, I start
bidding and by the time I get one of what I want for what I want
to pay, I usually have the entire amount in my balance.
When Paypal first started up, the "how do we do it" section of
their FAQ stated they were counting on a very, very large percentage
of their transactions not to involve a credit card at all - that
they just be internal transactions from one paypal balance to
another - at near-zero cost to them. The money they make on the
float was to be their sole source of income. And it probably
worked that way at first. Unfortunately, they made the service
attractive enough to people who DID have merchant accounts to
abandon them in favor of Paypal's free service.
My guess is that it is these people, who have NO INTENTION
WHATSOEVER of keeping a balance for paypal to earn a float
on and request weekly (or more frequent) checks of their
balance that is killing Paypal. Hence the "business and
premier" accounts that could shuffle money into bank
accounts automatically, for a fee, just as they'd be getting
with their merchant accounts. But how to enforce it? Apparently
by sending out letters to people who triggered their unspoken
transaction limit. Dumb.
Had paypal come out and said "there will now be a 2% processing
fee for cutting a check or transferring money more than once
per month to a bank account" I would have had NO PROBLEM AT ALL
with their decision. People using it as a merchant account
for their business would find those terms unacceptable and
either sign up for their business service or move along, freeing
them up of the burden those accounts place on their business
model.
As it is, though, I'll be keeping my account active until I
hit the $500 limit, at which point I'll switch to one of
their competetors. Unless, of course, they come out with
more poorly-thought-out, counter-productive rules. Who knows,
I may even keep it active longer than that - wait out the 6
month period and use it again. But under no circumstances
will I be signing up to pay a per-transaction fee and my
days of maintaining a balance are history - I'll be requesting
my first check ever (around $220) to protect myself from any
future poorly-publicized near-immediate policy changes that
could let them get their hands on my balance. I guess they
have accomplished something with this policy change - they've
changed the behaviour that probably made me one of their favorite
users.
Sigh.