First Windows Vista viruses unleashed

krsriraman

Junior Member
Jun 29, 2005
21
0
0
An Austrian hacker earned the dubious distinction of writing what are thought to be the first known viruses for Microsoft Corp.'s Windows Vista operating system. Written in July, the viruses take advantage of a new command shell, code-named Monad, that's included in the Windows Vista beta code.
The viruses were published last month in a virus-writing tutorial written for an underground hacker group calling itself the Ready Ranger Liberation Front, and take advantage of security vulnerabilities in the new command shell. Unlike the traditional Windows graphical user interface, which relies heavily on the mouse for navigation, command shells allow users to use powerful text-based commands, much like Windows' predecessor, DOS.

The viruses were written by a hacker calling himself "Second Part To Hell" and published on July 21, just days after Monad was publicly released by Microsoft, according to Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at Helsinki, Finland-based F-Secure Corp. Second Part To Hell is the pseudonym of an Austrian-based hacker who also goes by the name Mario, Hypponen said.

Because of its sophistication, the new command shell offers new opportunities for hackers, Second Part To Hell wrote in the tutorial, a copy of which was obtained by the IDG News Service. "Monad will be like Linux's BASH (Bourne Again Shell) -- that means a great number of commands and functions," he wrote. "We will be able to make as huge and complex scripts as we do in Linux."

F-Secure has named the virus family Danom (Monad in reverse). After examining the code, Hypponen said that the Danom family is disruptive but not capable of causing significant damage to Windows users. "These are proof-of-concept viruses where virus writers want to break new ground and write the first viruses for a new platform."

Most security experts had not expected to see a Windows Vista virus so soon, Hypponen said. "The only surprise here is that it came so early. It's been eight days since the beta of the operating system was out."

Monad was released several days prior to the Windows Vista beta.

Still, Danom's release does raise questions about whether Microsoft should enable the Monad shell by default in Windows Vista.

Because Monad's scripting capabilities will be used only by advanced users, Hypponen believes Microsoft should not offer the software as part of the standard Windows Vista package when it becomes commercially available in the second half of 2006. This would make the software less prevalent, and therefore less attractive to virus writers, he said.

Microsoft "got burned," by including similar software, called Windows Script Host, by default in its Windows 2000 operating system, he said. "Since it was on the system, all the virus writers were exploiting it."

Microsoft was unable to immediately comment.

Source: computerworld.com
 

bersl2

Golden Member
Aug 2, 2004
1,617
0
0
Standard proof-of-concept. That it uses the Monad "Oh, wait, maybe we do need a decent one" shell is peripheral. And I doubt it's in the shell anyway; it's not a vulnerability for the shell to be able to run arbitrary commands, but it is if the programs it runs lets the commands go through without the proper permissions.

And DOS "powerful"? Yeah, right.
 

drag

Elite Member
Jul 4, 2002
8,708
0
0
It can be. It's just based on the commands that MS offers that you can run inside a batch script..

And I didn't think Monad was going to be included with Vista anyways... I thought that they weren't going to offer it until a while afterwards. (when the Longhorn server version comes out, was my guess)

(it's also probably as something as stupid as:
#/bin/bash
#this is a virus!!
rm -rf /home/*
)
 

nweaver

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2001
6,813
1
0
tbh, the cli in windows was decent already (since the move to 2k+). Not BASH decent, but better. With the native vbscript, netsh commands, and some decent 3rd party/res kit apps designed for command line, you could do some good stuff. I'm still prone to just installing perl and calling that good for scripting :D
 

Seeruk

Senior member
Nov 16, 2003
986
0
0
If you look at the code it is about as newsworthy as a "Shock Horror a .bat file runs under DOS"