First MOAB has been delivered to Iraq...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Mookow

Lifer
Apr 24, 2001
10,162
0
0
Originally posted by: bentwookie
February 27, 2003: The U.S. Air Force is developing a new, 2nd generation, ten ton large, low air burst bomb. It will replace the older "Daisy Cutter" 7.5 ton bomb developed during the 1960s. This was a 7.5 ton bomb using a semi-liquid explosive for clearing landing zones in the Vietnam jungle...

Where did that article come from? I could swear I have read it, but I cant remember where, and its bugging me
 

bentwookie

Golden Member
Aug 3, 2002
1,771
0
0
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: bentwookie
February 27, 2003: The U.S. Air Force is developing a new, 2nd generation, ten ton large, low air burst bomb. It will replace the older "Daisy Cutter" 7.5 ton bomb developed during the 1960s. This was a 7.5 ton bomb using a semi-liquid explosive for clearing landing zones in the Vietnam jungle...

Where did that article come from? I could swear I have read it, but I cant remember where, and its bugging me

check my link about halfway up the thread.
 

Pastfinder

Platinum Member
Jul 2, 2000
2,352
0
0
Now all we need is to get the remains of the Republican Guard out in the open, then drop the sucker...
 

Marshallj

Platinum Member
Mar 26, 2003
2,326
0
76
Originally posted by: sparkyclarky
Interesting. In other words, our way of sidestepping using nuclear weapons by making a conventional bomb more powerful than the only nuclear weapons ever dropped in war. Man do we think up some interesting ways to kill each other and get away with it....

What kind of crack are you smoking?

This is nowhere even remotely close to the power of a nuclear weapon.

This is 9 tons of explosives + steel casing. The first nuke we ever detonated (Trinity) was the equivalent of 20,000 tons.

 

XCLAN

Platinum Member
Mar 22, 2001
2,401
0
0
omg each one of you have no idea wut yer talkin about
i helped build the MOAB
rolleye.gif
 

dudleydocker

Golden Member
Jul 5, 2000
1,026
0
0
Interesting. In other words, our way of sidestepping using nuclear weapons by making a conventional bomb more powerful than the only nuclear weapons ever dropped in war. Man do we think up some interesting ways to kill each other and get away with it....

hehe.....an aspiring journalist if ever I saw one!:disgust:


So next time before b!tching about the US dropping "conventional boms more powerful than nukes", try not to be off, by say, any more than TWO orders of magnitude. It would be an improvement.


over the last week I do believe that the press has set a record for the most wildly outlandish, absurd, and just plain stupid comments of all time.

Press glum over U.S. victory

Peter Jennings gets my vote....who's in charge at ABC that lets such a dick blather on like him?:confused:
 

rickn

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
7,064
0
0
Originally posted by: XCLAN
omg each one of you have no idea wut yer talkin about
i helped build the MOAB
rolleye.gif

I think you meant MOAF (Mother of all Farts)
 

DT4K

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2002
6,944
3
81
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
The war is almost over, so why are they moving the MOAB over now?

We may still have a lot of fighting to do.
They probably want to drop it in the middle of Tikrit. That is Saddam's hometown afterall and home to some of his most loyal followers. Too bad nukes have that pesky radiation fallout to worry about. J/K.

Some of you should learn a little math.

21,000 lbs is just a little less than 20,000,000 lbs. LMFAO.
 

Jmman

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 1999
5,302
0
76
Originally posted by: sparkyclarky
Interesting. In other words, our way of sidestepping using nuclear weapons by making a conventional bomb more powerful than the only nuclear weapons ever dropped in war. Man do we think up some interesting ways to kill each other and get away with it....

Obviously intelligence is not a prerequisite for being an Anandtech member.....;)