• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

First it was RIAA now MPAA

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Hollywood movie studios may sue computer users

LOS ANGELES - Taking a cue from recording companies, Hollywood movie studios are preparing to file copyright-infringement lawsuits against computer users it says are illegally distributing movies online, a source familiar with the studios' plans said Wednesday.

The lawsuits will target movie fans who share digitized versions of films over peer-to-peer networks, with the first wave of litigation planned for as early as today, according to the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Like the recording industry, which began suing individual music file-sharers last year, the movie studios plan an ongoing litigation campaign, the source said.

The Motion Picture Association of America, which represents the major film studios, declined to comment Wednesday. But the organization issued a release saying its chief executive would be making "a major announcement regarding illegal file sharing of motion pictures on peer-to-peer networks" early today.

The movie studios were still finalizing how many lawsuits would make up their initial filing, but it would probably be around 200 or so, the source said.

Videotaped copies of films in theaters often are digitized or burned off DVDs and then distributed on file-sharing networks.

The MPAA claims the U.S. movie industry loses more than $3 billion annually in potential global revenue because of physical piracy, or bogus copies of videos and DVDs of its films.

The MPAA doesn't give an estimate for how much online piracy costs the industry annually, but claims the health of the industry is at stake.

Along with the recording industry, movie studios have tried to shut down companies behind file-sharing software through litigation with little success
 
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Moronic reporter. You burn to a DVD, not from it. 😛

- M4H


Looks like you are the moron. They rip from a DVD and then encode with DIVX or other compressions to allow the movie to fit on 1 CD in most cases.
 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Moronic reporter. You burn to a DVD, not from it. 😛

- M4H


Looks like you are the moron. They rip from a DVD and then encode with DIVX or other compressions to allow the movie to fit on 1 CD in most cases.

So in your mind, Rip = Burn? 😕

If so, please RIP after "rip"ing to death in a fire.

- M4H
 
Of course they are going to start treating media as software. It the only thing they can do.

No one is really saying you can't rip or copy. Only that you cannot make the media available to everyone online. It's the DISTRIBUTION part they really don't like.

So don't distribute it widely, and they'll leave you alone.

How hard is that?
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Of course they are going to start treating media as software. It the only thing they can do.

No one is really saying you can't rip or copy. Only that you cannot make the media available to everyone online. It's the DISTRIBUTION part they really don't like.

So don't distribute it widely, and they'll leave you alone.

How hard is that?

:thumbsup: to that.

:thumbsdown: to copy-protection that doesn't let you rip a legally-purchased CD.

- M4H
 
OMG....Why don't they start with all the people who rent movies and copy them to VHS tapes first

fvking morons

Ausm
 
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Amused
Of course they are going to start treating media as software. It the only thing they can do.

No one is really saying you can't rip or copy. Only that you cannot make the media available to everyone online. It's the DISTRIBUTION part they really don't like.

So don't distribute it widely, and they'll leave you alone.

How hard is that?

:thumbsup: to that.

:thumbsdown: to copy-protection that doesn't let you rip a legally-purchased CD.

- M4H

I don't like it either, but I don't blame the record companies. I'd probably be doing the same thing in their shoes.
 
I don't get this really... how will they handle suing someone who owns hundreds of dvds but might download a movie to not have to see it in the theatre. By the time you get to court, they will say 'You downloaded Spiderman2!' but can't you just wipe out your dvd collection and prove that you own it.

I've not interest in paying 10$ to see each movie that come out so I download some, but I will buy the movie I download on dvd around 90% of the time unless it sucks bad (Hellboy comes to mind).
 
Originally posted by: Feneant2

I've not interest in paying 10$ to see each movie that come out so I download some, but I will buy the movie I download on dvd around 90% of the time unless it sucks bad (Hellboy comes to mind).

What makes you think you're entitled to see any movie for free?
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Feneant2

I've not interest in paying 10$ to see each movie that come out so I download some, but I will buy the movie I download on dvd around 90% of the time unless it sucks bad (Hellboy comes to mind).

What makes you think you're entitled to see any movie for free?

It's his right as an American, duh! :roll:

- M4H
 
I don't get this really... how will they handle suing someone who owns hundreds of dvds but might download a movie to not have to see it in the theatre. By the time you get to court, they will say 'You downloaded Spiderman2!' but can't you just wipe out your dvd collection and prove that you own it.

They go after people who distribute movies, not people who download. If you distribute a movie you legally own, you're still going to get sued and lose.
 
Also of interest, H.R.4077 has passed the House and is now in the Senate's hands.

This bill would create new Federal penalties for using a video recorder in theatres and "distribution to the public by electronic means" (assuming peer to peer is the target here).


Link
 
The lawsuits will target movie fans who share digitized versions of films over peer-to-peer networks, with the first wave of litigation planned for as early as today, according to the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

so basically ... people who know what they are doing will have nothing to worry about.
 
Originally posted by: purbeast0
The lawsuits will target movie fans who share digitized versions of films over peer-to-peer networks, with the first wave of litigation planned for as early as today, according to the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

so basically ... people who know what they are doing will have nothing to worry about.

Sure, because the courts have always been known for their technologically savvy nature.
 
Originally posted by: Feneant2
I've not interest in paying 10$ to see each movie that come out so I download some, but I will buy the movie I download on dvd around 90% of the time unless it sucks bad (Hellboy comes to mind).
People can say "I'll buy it if I like it" all they want but the reality is there are thousands upon thousands of people downloading. Do you think it's a try before you buy industry ? Only if they make it so. And they haven't.
 
Back
Top