zerocool84
Lifer
- Nov 11, 2004
- 36,041
- 472
- 126
Did you plan on running one without the enclosure?
Mebbe some H2O cooling action.
Looks like 10.5 inches for the PCB. Same as 8800/9800/GT200.
Exactly and how big is the cooler on that thing???
Did you plan on running one without the enclosure?
Mebbe some H2O cooling action.
Looks like 10.5 inches for the PCB. Same as 8800/9800/GT200.
No idea yet.
Odd, there's some posts missing around.
I'm pretty sure Dr.Pizza has been doing a little housecleaning.
OT: The heatspreader looks a bit smaller than GTX280, at least it seems that way. If the PCB is indeed 10.5" like GT200 cards,
It appears less dominating on the card as the GTX280 I have here.
How come it says GF100??
I made that image from the 2 pictures on this page:
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/65933/cebit-nvidia-gtx-480-op-de-gevoelige-plaat-gevangen.html
It's the GTX 480 using the GF100 chip, at least according to them. And it does look to be it.
That pretty much sums it up. So rather than perpetuate something that may or may not be accurate, I just called it GF100.
Either you're confused, or I'm confused.
Last I knew, 3dfx ended up using multiple chips on single cards because their single GPU wasn't good enough.
That strategy is more similar to ATI than NV. ATI designs a more mid-level chip which can be put on a dual GPU card for the high end, and give a reasonably priced high-mid card.
NV is trying to brute force by making a single GPU that's as powerful as possible, which wasn't what 3dfx did...
Guys the size is fine. I have seen longer.
Whether it be brute force trough the GPU or brute force through the PCB, you still end up with the same results.
Why do nvidia protect their graphics chips with a metal jacket? Its not like its going to be damaged as its under a HSF
