First Gabrielle Giffords images since shooting published on Facebook

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
All of your posts come down to "conservatives dumb, me smarter than all".

Neither of which has been challenged.

What you think makes you look intelligent on your screen, does not on ours.

A mind cannot accurately model a mind greater than its own. It is quite expected that minds that don't grasp even the basics of critical thinking nor come close to me in raw processing power would have difficulties following me.

P&N is not known for its brilliance. In fact, it is known as a shithole. Why would you think that I would base my opinion of myself off the interpretations of the denizens of such a place?
You may have peers here, but I do not. The people here may be able to accurately judge you, but their judgements are useless to me. When I desire judgement I must go to a place where there are people with sufficient brainpower to operate within my sphere.
I cannot slice my ideas on the dullards here. If a sharp mind arises, I will use it. Until then, I'll idly kick you rocks about. The knee-jerk emotional reactions of the sub-norms here are of some academic interest -- it's interesting to watch a Fundie in his natural habitat. (When out debating religion they actually try. Apparently the political arena is not worthy of anything approaching that level of effort to them, as the drop in quality is quite remarkable.)
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Neither of which has been challenged.



A mind cannot accurately model a mind greater than its own. It is quite expected that minds that don't grasp even the basics of critical thinking nor come close to me in raw processing power would have difficulties following me.

P&N is not known for its brilliance. In fact, it is known as a shithole. Why would you think that I would base my opinion of myself off the interpretations of the denizens of such a place?
You may have peers here, but I do not. The people here may be able to accurately judge you, but their judgements are useless to me. When I desire judgement I must go to a place where there are people with sufficient brainpower to operate within my sphere.
I cannot slice my ideas on the dullards here. If a sharp mind arises, I will use it. Until then, I'll idly kick you rocks about. The knee-jerk emotional reactions of the sub-norms here are of some academic interest -- it's interesting to watch a Fundie in his natural habitat. (When out debating religion they actually try. Apparently the political arena is not worthy of anything approaching that level of effort to them, as the drop in quality is quite remarkable.)

images
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
sorry way way off the mark, the guy was crazy to the point where none of this has any relation to anything.

trying to smear your political opponents by associating them with the action of some guy who went out of his mind..and did so long before any current issues is simply misguided.

you might as well blame democrats for casey anthony killing her daughter because they created an atmosphere where talking about abortion aka killing babies was acceptable.

That is the level of crazy the discussion on giffords got to, and frankly lefties that went there should be ashamed, normally they are the first to point out that kind of horrible reasoning.

The fact that Righties' mouthpieces raving on about "Second Amendment Remedies" has greatly diminished would seem to indicate that even they apparently see some truth in what I've offered.

Don't poison the well when you have to drink from it yourself.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
The fact that Righties' mouthpieces raving on about "Second Amendment Remedies" has greatly diminished would seem to indicate that even they apparently see some truth in what I've offered.

Don't poison the well when you have to drink from it yourself.

you could also say that fewer democrats are saying that bs anymore as well, well outside of a few cranks like those on this forum, so which is it?

in any case it has nothing to do with any claims making the false link anyhow.
 

davmat787

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2010
5,512
24
76
Neither of which has been challenged.



A mind cannot accurately model a mind greater than its own. It is quite expected that minds that don't grasp even the basics of critical thinking nor come close to me in raw processing power would have difficulties following me.

P&N is not known for its brilliance. In fact, it is known as a shithole. Why would you think that I would base my opinion of myself off the interpretations of the denizens of such a place?
You may have peers here, but I do not. The people here may be able to accurately judge you, but their judgements are useless to me. When I desire judgement I must go to a place where there are people with sufficient brainpower to operate within my sphere.
I cannot slice my ideas on the dullards here. If a sharp mind arises, I will use it. Until then, I'll idly kick you rocks about. The knee-jerk emotional reactions of the sub-norms here are of some academic interest -- it's interesting to watch a Fundie in his natural habitat. (When out debating religion they actually try. Apparently the political arena is not worthy of anything approaching that level of effort to them, as the drop in quality is quite remarkable.)

Ahh, the ole "I'm just misunderstood, so others must be dumber than I, ergo I am smarter than all" argument. You can count on that like the rain here in Seattle.

But at least you are consistent, you have stated P&N is merely your toilet. If that is the case, your posts are your stool samples, and your stool samples indicate a very fucked up diet and disease.

The heights of douchebaggery to which you fly have no peer, but you mistake having no peer in that arena for being more intelligent than all.

Go ahead and get the last word in, it is a must in your mind and further indicative of your problems.
 

SparkyJJO

Lifer
May 16, 2002
13,357
7
81
Neither of which has been challenged.



A mind cannot accurately model a mind greater than its own. It is quite expected that minds that don't grasp even the basics of critical thinking nor come close to me in raw processing power would have difficulties following me.

P&N is not known for its brilliance. In fact, it is known as a shithole. Why would you think that I would base my opinion of myself off the interpretations of the denizens of such a place?
You may have peers here, but I do not. The people here may be able to accurately judge you, but their judgements are useless to me. When I desire judgement I must go to a place where there are people with sufficient brainpower to operate within my sphere.
I cannot slice my ideas on the dullards here. If a sharp mind arises, I will use it. Until then, I'll idly kick you rocks about. The knee-jerk emotional reactions of the sub-norms here are of some academic interest -- it's interesting to watch a Fundie in his natural habitat. (When out debating religion they actually try. Apparently the political arena is not worthy of anything approaching that level of effort to them, as the drop in quality is quite remarkable.)

Three letters.

L O L
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
you could also say that fewer democrats are saying that bs anymore as well, well outside of a few cranks like those on this forum, so which is it?

in any case it has nothing to do with any claims making the false link anyhow.

I don't recall any nationally recognized Dem figures raving & making innuendos to their base about second amendment bullshit...

The same can't be said for Repubs.

We both know this to be true, obfuscate as you might.

Whether or not their creation of a poisonous atmosphere had anything to do with the Giffords shooting is speculation, but the whole episode resulted in the Right toning it down, which actually grants them more credibility rather than less.

"If we can't get what we want at the polls, then we kill you!" doesn't look good on anybody. It never was quite like that, but the attempt to intimidate was obvious.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
Ahh, the ole "I'm just misunderstood, so others must be dumber than I, ergo I am smarter than all" argument. You can count on that like the rain here in Seattle.

A model being easy for your ego to accept does not imply that it applies. My reality being outside of your experience does not make it an impossibility.

I am smart. It's something I've gotten used to. The relative positions of everyone else is independent of that fact. Whether I'm in surroundings that have been run through a high-pass filter or a low-pass filter, my intellectual capacity doesn't change.
Judgements of others' intelligence is made on the totality of the data they provide. That the collated data of past experience also suggests that the stupidity of stupid people causes them to have problems understanding smart people, and that such is commented upon, does not imply that the affirmation of that consequent is the only criterion.

But at least you are consistent, you have stated P&N is merely your toilet. If that is the case, your posts are your stool samples, and your stool samples indicate a very fucked up diet and disease.

The analogy does not stretch that far. Try again.

Here's one that covers the area you're looking in: "I am a miner of precious gems. Here in P&N, where the wash is barren, I merely whack people with my shovel as idle entertainment."

Very little of what, "Whacking people with my shovel," shows you is indicative of my mining techniques or the size of my hoard.

The "gems" you all so proudly display are of miserable quality. Your holdings show that none of you can judge cut, clarity, color, or carat, so you are useless to me in sorting my own stash.

Go ahead and get the last word in, it is a must in your mind and further indicative of your problems.

If you want the last words, try tying up your loose ends within the content of your post. Leaving a mess for me to tidy up will generally result in me tidying up.
 
Last edited: