cutforscience
Banned
- Jun 10, 2011
- 291
- 0
- 0
why didn't we ban gun yet?
has anyone else noticed the republican pitbulls have toned down the rhetoric since this has happened?
Best to Giffords in her struggle. I had hoped that she could recuperate enough to take back her seat, the ultimate reversal to the loon who shot her. Doesn't look like that will happen, although as Thump says, if she hasn't yet plateaued you don't know what she can ultimately do. It's still faintly possible if she can express herself via the written word and the intellect is still there. She'd be a hell of an advocate to those suffering similar problems, stroke victims and the like.
has anyone else noticed the republican pitbulls have toned down the rhetoric since this has happened?
But the Democrats seem to have ramped it up.
wish her all the best and a speedy recovery
It's different for liberals. This isn't our base:
![]()
Absolutely well said. And I am still pissed that asshole got away with the insanity plea. That's pure horseshit.
has anyone else noticed the republican pitbulls have toned down the rhetoric since this has happened?
See this is exactly what I am referring to. There was no indication that this guy was a 'right winger' or 'teabagger' or anything else. It seems if anything this guy leaned more LEFT than RIGHT. Yet we still have this type of thing being spewed here trying to portray this type of shit as something stirred up by right-wing radio or whatever.
And this is typical juvenile deflection.
A mention was made that the right-wing rhetoric has been toned down. Would not that action be an acknowledgement of its acidity?
You do not have to require that acidity to be a cause in this case for a shocking, violent act to remind you of people's ability to perform shocking, violent acts, and lead you to think of the things that can cause them.
Why was "right-wing rhetoric" instantly jumped upon in this case? Because it was so likely! You have propagandists leading an army of illiterate peasants, and those propagandists were beating the war drums something fierce. It takes no great leap to think that one of those peasants would take it upon himself to fire the first volley in the war he had been conditioned to believe was inevitable.
That is a problem that the right-wing has that the left does not. Smart, emotionally healthy people have mobile minds, and a part of exploring new concepts is finding that they are wrong. This preps the field against propaganda. A propagandist would have a much harder time raising an army of liberals by projecting a delusional fantasy because he'd have to corral the much higher degree of independent thought. While he rank and file are limited in their protections, they can bank on atheists tearing down any false god.
Conservatives are mental shut-ins who need somebody else to tell them what the scary outside world looks like. Liberals are fearless explorers who have no need to bank on such unreliable information sources.
While one has to worry about deluding a mental shut-in, the same is not true when dealing with a person who has external sources of information. You can bank on the latter bouncing their emotions off their wider knowledge base.
has anyone else noticed the republican pitbulls have toned down the rhetoric since this has happened?
It's different for liberals. This isn't our base:
![]()
And that isn't the Conservative base either.
See this is exactly what I am referring to. There was no indication that this guy was a 'right winger' or 'teabagger' or anything else. It seems if anything this guy leaned more LEFT than RIGHT. Yet we still have this type of thing being spewed here trying to portray this type of shit as something stirred up by right-wing radio or whatever. We have people in this thread (LIBERALS!) spewing hate toward right-wing candidates like Bachmann. Every conservative I see in here is wishing her well, yet the left will still try to use this shit to try to portray conservatives and republicans as the problem.
Completely disgusting and par for the course as far as I am concerned.
Raving on about "Second Amendment Remedies" does create a certain atmosphere, wouldn't you agree? A highly poisonous one, at that.
Crazy people are easily influenced by the atmosphere in which they kinda function. They're strongly influenced by things the rest of us barely notice, like the phase of the moon. They're not called lunatics for nothing.
Well yeah. He'd now be old and fat.
Religious, white, old people. And how is that not the conservative base?
And the democrat base are a bunch of retards who jack off to pony cartoons.
That's the best you can do? I could drip snot on my keyboard and short out a more interesting response than that.
Try posting with some style.
