• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

first AMD Radeon Pro Duo ReviewWorld’s Fastest Graphics

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It would be all kind of awesome, if:

- it had CUDA
- at least 8GB VRAM per GPU
- was not more than 1000

1. Why were you expecting CUDA (Nvidia closed proprietary platform) to be supported by AMD hardware?
2. A lot of professional applications do not require such large amounts of VRAM (granted, a lot do require large VRAM amounts).
3. It can run on FirePro drivers, therefore it's perfectly reasonable for AMD to command premium prices.
 
Not unless your benchmark suite of games are all GameWorks or titles where CF doesn't function.

A 980Ti at 1.5ghz is actually only ~20% OC due to it's default boost clocks in the 1.25ghz range.

As a guy running twin 390s, I can say that's disturbingly common even in triple a titles these days.
 
i've given up on dual monitors for gaming... it sucks... for productivity it's good... for gaming, I would need 3 monitors. But why go 3 monitors when I can have 1 sleek 21:9 curved LCD?
 
big_radeon-duo-drivers.jpg.ashx


Confirmed compatibility with Firepro drivers. SOURCE: HotHardware

big_radeon-duo-3dsmax-perf.jpg.ashx

In Blackmagic Davinci Resolve 12 and Autodesk 3DS MAX AMD is claiming big performance improvements thanks to the Radeon Pro Duo’s pair of GPUs.
 
1. Why were you expecting CUDA (Nvidia closed proprietary platform) to be supported by AMD hardware?
2. A lot of professional applications do not require such large amounts of VRAM (granted, a lot do require large VRAM amounts).
3. It can run on FirePro drivers, therefore it's perfectly reasonable for AMD to command premium prices.

1. i did not expect it. Still from my own POV, its pretty much whats keeping this product from awesomeness. BTW, funnily, it seems, perhaps not so long from now, its actually going to support CUDA (sort of), thanks to Cross-compiler developed by OTOY for their own Octane Engine. I assume this will make possible to port other CUDA apps to AMD hardware too and its something, what AMD should have done long time ago. No wonder Nvidia has locked HPC segment for themselves.

2. Again, it was from my own POV, naturally if one does not need a lot of VRAM, its ok for him

3. Not really sure to what purposes are FirePro drivers good for except using them to display viewports in apps like AutoCAD, 3Dsmax etc,... without all the jittering, jagged edges and all around uncomfortable experience you get with regular gaming cards, but if thats all that is, then you did not really needed it to have with a dual-chip card, since you can use only one GPU with those apps anyway. Like, no Crossfire for AutoCAD (at least i am not aware of that).
 
Back
Top