First 9600XT Numbers !

[MetD]

Here:

http://www.darkhardware.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1281

 

[NYHoustonman]

Not bad. I still doubt it'll beat a 9700 Pro, though.

 

[Peter D]

Originally posted by: NYHoustonman
Not bad. I still doubt it'll beat a 9700 Pro, though.

 

[McArra]

It won't even beat a 9700np. It will beat a 9600 pro

 

[jimmyl930]

Thanks for the link. Looks good.

 

[em1]

I wonder what the test rig was? I saw a review of a 9600pro with better numbers than that.

 

[reever]

Numbers are strange because they chose a stupid way to test it, plus their graph is messed up, a 20 fps difference makes no difference in the length of the bar. Quake 3 at 1024x768 is so cpu limited its not even funny and so is ut2k3 botmatch, only test that isn't cpu limited is the flyby which shows a 20 fos difference

 

[Lonyo]

The most interesting thing about that is that it's an Elsa card.

I didn't know Elsa were releasing cards already, let alone ATi cards. I knew they were back, but this is the first I've seen of their products.

 

[BoomAM]

Originally posted by: Vegetto

Originally posted by: NYHoustonman
Not bad. I still doubt it'll beat a 9700 Pro, though.

Same here.
Its a good card. But no amount of core speed can make up for the bandwidth difference between it and the 9700s.

Originally posted by: McArra
It won't even beat a 9700np. It will beat a 9600 pro

I agree.

 

[Blackroot]

I can't read turkish, grr.

 

[kylebisme]

Originally posted by: NYHoustonman
Not bad. I still doubt it'll beat a 9700 Pro, though.

it won't, that comment in anand's article was just more of his usaual missinformation. regardless, it looks like a damn nice card for the price.


oh on a side not, the graph on that link are just comical with the quake3 and ut2003 framerates on the chart with 3dmark scores.