• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Firms with Bush ties snag Katrina deals

Firms with Bush ties snag Katrina deals Sat Sep 10,11:03 AM ET



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Companies with ties to the Bush White House and the former head of FEMA are clinching some of the administration's first disaster relief and reconstruction contracts in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

At least two major corporate clients of lobbyist Joe Allbaugh,

President George W. Bush's former campaign manager and a former head of the

Federal Emergency Management Agency, have already been tapped to start recovery work along the battered Gulf Coast.

One is Shaw Group Inc. and the other is Halliburton Co. subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root. Vice President

Dick Cheney is a former head of Halliburton.

Bechtel National Inc., a unit of San Francisco-based Bechtel Corp., has also been selected by FEMA to provide short-term housing for people displaced by the hurricane. Bush named Bechtel's CEO to his Export Council and put the former CEO of Bechtel Energy in charge of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

Experts say it has been common practice in both Republican and Democratic administrations for policy makers to take lobbying jobs once they leave office, and many of the same companies seeking contracts in the wake of Hurricane Katrina have already received billions of dollars for work in Iraq.

Halliburton alone has earned more than $9 billion.

Pentagon audits released by Democrats in June showed $1.03 billion in "questioned" costs and $422 million in "unsupported" costs for Halliburton's work in Iraq.

But the web of Bush administration connections is attracting renewed attention from watchdog groups in the post-Katrina reconstruction rush. Congress has already appropriated more than $60 billion in emergency funding as a down payment on recovery efforts projected to cost well over $100 billion.

"The government has got to stop stacking senior positions with people who are repeatedly cashing in on the public trust in order to further private commercial interests," said Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight.

TWO BUSH APPOINTEES AT HALLIBURTON

Allbaugh formally registered as a lobbyist for Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root in February.

In lobbying disclosure forms filed with the Senate, Allbaugh said his goal was to "educate the congressional and executive branch on defense, disaster relief and homeland security issues affecting Kellogg Brown and Root."

Melissa Norcross, a Halliburton spokeswoman, said Allbaugh has not, since he was hired, "consulted on any specific contracts that the company is considering pursuing, nor has he been tasked by the company with any lobbying responsibilities."

Allbaugh is also a friend of Michael Brown, director of FEMA who was removed as head of Katrina disaster relief and sent back to Washington amid allegations he had padded his resume.

A few months after Allbaugh was hired by Halliburton, the company retained another high-level Bush appointee, Kirk Van Tine.

Van Tine registered as a lobbyist for Halliburton six months after resigning as deputy transportation secretary, a position he held from December 2003 to December 2004.

On Friday, Kellogg Brown & Root received $29.8 million in Pentagon contracts to begin rebuilding Navy bases in Louisiana and Mississippi. Norcross said the work was covered under a contract that the company negotiated before Allbaugh was hired.

Halliburton continues to be a source of income for Cheney, who served as its chief executive officer from 1995 until 2000 when he joined the Republican ticket for the White House. According to tax filings released in April, Cheney's income included $194,852 in deferred pay from the company, which has also won billion-dollar government contracts in Iraq.

Cheney's office said the amount of deferred compensation is fixed and is not affected by Halliburton's current economic performance or earnings.

Allbaugh's other major client, Baton Rouge-based Shaw Group, has updated its Web site to say: "Hurricane Recovery Projects -- Apply Here!"

Shaw said on Thursday it has received a $100 million emergency FEMA contract for housing management and construction. Shaw also clinched a $100 million order on Friday from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Shaw Group spokesman Chris Sammons said Allbaugh was providing the company with "general consulting on business matters," and would not say whether he played a direct role in any of the Katrina deals. "We don't comment on specific consulting activities," he said.

 
so? if they get the job done, then whats the big deal?

the same is true with every administration. they award their friends.

also, if another company offered the same services for significantly less and Bush and company still chose their friends, then complain. otherwise, so what?
 
Originally posted by: raildogg
so? if they get the job done, then whats the big deal?

the same is true with every administration. they award their friends.

also, if another company offered the same services for significantly less and Bush and company still chose their friends, then complain. otherwise, so what?

You assume that no other company is capable of the work? Or that there are no other companies that bid for the contract? Keep dreaming.
 
Originally posted by: sygyzy
Originally posted by: raildogg
so? if they get the job done, then whats the big deal?

the same is true with every administration. they award their friends.

also, if another company offered the same services for significantly less and Bush and company still chose their friends, then complain. otherwise, so what?

You assume that no other company is capable of the work? Or that there are no other companies that bid for the contract? Keep dreaming.

reread
 
You guys know what the real problem here is? Not that some politician is making a little money here, not that there's some corrupt system thats cheating out america, but that this wasn't posted someplace important where this matter could be discussed by all sides of the political spectrum. someplace where everyone would take others views into consideration and think about them...someplace like here
 
Originally posted by: MoPHo
You guys know what the real problem here is? Not that some politician is making a little money here, not that there's some corrupt system thats cheating out america, but that this wasn't posted someplace important where this matter could be discussed by all sides of the political spectrum. someplace where everyone would take others views into consideration and think about them...someplace like here

I don't venture in there.

It makes me lose sleep....
 
Originally posted by: raildogg
so? if they get the job done, then whats the big deal?

the same is true with every administration. they award their friends.

also, if another company offered the same services for significantly less and Bush and company still chose their friends, then complain. otherwise, so what?
How do you think no-bid contracts work?
 
Originally posted by: Brutuskend
Originally posted by: MoPHo
You guys know what the real problem here is? Not that some politician is making a little money here, not that there's some corrupt system thats cheating out america, but that this wasn't posted someplace important where this matter could be discussed by all sides of the political spectrum. someplace where everyone would take others views into consideration and think about them...someplace like here

I don't venture in there.

It makes me lose sleep....

So then it's OK to turn Off Topic into the wasteland that is P&N?
 
Originally posted by: mflacy
Originally posted by: Brutuskend
Originally posted by: MoPHo
You guys know what the real problem here is? Not that some politician is making a little money here, not that there's some corrupt system thats cheating out america, but that this wasn't posted someplace important where this matter could be discussed by all sides of the political spectrum. someplace where everyone would take others views into consideration and think about them...someplace like here

I don't venture in there.

It makes me lose sleep....
So then it's OK to turn Off Topic into the wasteland that is P&N?
What's the difference? Both forums are full of idots and flamers.



 
Originally posted by: Pocatello
Friends of Bush or friends of Bill, take your pick. It's nice to have friends in higher places.

It's what happens. This is a very normal business practice. When our new CIO was hired, most of our new projects ended up being contracted out to vendors he already had a relationship with. The first additional person he hired was someone from his previous company, and our current interns are relatives of his.

But there is nothing wrong with that. Trust comes before price - because you can waste a lot of time trying to price shop, and sometimes the better price will end up with the worst quality.
 
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
And he cut wages as well so those rich fat bastards don't have to pay the going wage.

It is my dream to some day become a rich fat bastard. 😉
 
Originally posted by: raildogg
so? if they get the job done, then whats the big deal?

the same is true with every administration. they award their friends.

also, if another company offered the same services for significantly less and Bush and company still chose their friends, then complain. otherwise, so what?


And his good friend the head of FEMA certainly did an excellent job dont you think? I mean who cares if he is not qualified after all no one was offering a lesser salary right?
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: mflacy
Originally posted by: Brutuskend
Originally posted by: MoPHo
You guys know what the real problem here is? Not that some politician is making a little money here, not that there's some corrupt system thats cheating out america, but that this wasn't posted someplace important where this matter could be discussed by all sides of the political spectrum. someplace where everyone would take others views into consideration and think about them...someplace like here

I don't venture in there.

It makes me lose sleep....
So then it's OK to turn Off Topic into the wasteland that is P&N?
What's the difference? Both forums are full of idots and flamers.

Amen.
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: mflacy
Originally posted by: Brutuskend
Originally posted by: MoPHo
You guys know what the real problem here is? Not that some politician is making a little money here, not that there's some corrupt system thats cheating out america, but that this wasn't posted someplace important where this matter could be discussed by all sides of the political spectrum. someplace where everyone would take others views into consideration and think about them...someplace like here

I don't venture in there.

It makes me lose sleep....
So then it's OK to turn Off Topic into the wasteland that is P&N?
What's the difference? Both forums are full of idots and flamers.

Idiots? Sure. Flamers? I beg to differ. I doubt there's a thread there without flaming. It's a little more civil here.

This thread really needs to be in P&N.
 
I posted this in P&N last night:
Where does the money go?

Think about it... 200 billion dollars expected to be needed; 60 billion already signed for by congress.

Do the math.
Let's say 1 million people lost their homes.
and, we'll use the 200 billion dollar figure.

That's 200,000 per person.
Or, 800,000 per average family of 4.
wtf??
I tend to believe that any home, except for perhaps some of the McMansions, can be completely rebuilt, plus new water lines, electric, etc. be run at that home for a small fraction of that amount.
 
Back
Top