Nice article, but sounds more like plain ol' bitching to me. Life is a flux. Everything changes. You cant expect things to stay the same. Right now, it makes sense for consoles to dominate, but it doesn't mean that computers will not take over again in the future. I cant believe that the writer is talking about how the technological progress is being slowed when we are using $250 graphics cards over $500 cards. Hell, he must be a rich boy that guy... I am very much willing to spend more money on a good computer as opposed to playing on a console, but If I had to pay $500 for a video card to be able to max out my graphics in most games, I'd think twice about gaming on a PC. Luckily it is not so, and has never been so to my best knowledge. I like progress, but sometimes I fee like progress is going too fast and needs to be slowed down a little. Maybe devs need to concentrate a little more on gameplay as opposed to graphics. Graphics are very important for me, but gameplay - more so.
Also, I want to point out that people are dramatizing and blowing this problem of consolitis out of proportion.
I see NO SHORTAGE of GOOD PC games coming out in the resent years. In fact there's way too many of them. I wish the devs would slow the fuck down a little, and capitalize on the profits from what is already out there instead of rushing sequels.
Some good examples are Mass Effect 2, Witcher 2, Dragon Age 2, and Deadspace 2. These games are HUGE, and have plenty of replayability. I havent even finished the originals yet, and here they are coming out with sequels already...
Why is it that everyone is ok with Blizzard taking their damned sweet little time to release Starcraft II, yet they demand, and are ok with, other companies pumping out new titles like mad? And no, it's not like Blizzard games are somehow "unique" or "special". At least not anymore. Not after the garbage that Starcraft 2 is.
Anyway.. It's like I said, there is no shortage of PC Games right now. I don't even have time to play HALF of what I want to play. No innovation? There's plenty. Just take a look at "other" game companies for a change. Like 1C for example. Men of WAr, Theatre of War, Space Wolves, and many many others by 1C show plenty of innovation if you're willing to look for it. Anyone why says there's not enough PC Games seriously needs to get a life. There... I said it. Go outside, get some fresh air. Get a friggin' job, a real job. And if your job allows you to play games every day or several days a week, I am real jealous of you, rich boy, cause I'm working my ass of here, and the only thing I can think about when I come home is going to sleep. but yeah, I know how some people are. I been that way in High School and early College. Maybe if I was actually taking anything seriously back then, and care about anything other than Diablo II, I would be doing much better in life right now.
To sum this up, I will say that yes, off course there are less good games nowadays, and less innovation, but there is no shortage of such!
Now... MineCraft? Seriously? That game is garbage. Yeah, I value gameplay over graphics, but not when we are going back to the era of 486 DX graphics wise. And if we're going to go there, I rather play Doom, Blood, Hexen and all that other stuff. Props to that guy for making that game all by himself. Good for him. A real programming god he is, and I can see why many people flock to this game, especially those interested in programming. But I just want to play a good fun game where graphics dont look like squares - not test out this guy's beta phases. I'll leave that for those with too much free time on their hands.