Originally posted by: n7
Hmm....i can't remember FF 1.0 evar crashing on me...
/hugs his FF![]()
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: n7
Hmm....i can't remember FF 1.0 evar crashing on me...
/hugs his FF![]()
Originally posted by: BlueWeasel
Firefox 1.0 has started crashing for me, mainly when I'm checking my Gmail account. I've got several extensions installed, so I'm wondering which one of those is the problem.
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: Nothinman
FireFox hasn't crashed for me since, well not since I can remember.
It crashes occasionally when using java for me, but still far less often than IE did. At least when FF crashes explorer.exe doesn't get restarted.
Originally posted by: Buz2b
(('m starting to sound like a traveling Mozilla salesman but I'm not) I would respectfully dissagree with your assumption that Firefox is not a mainstream browser. Recent story on the news that Firefox has gained steadily on IE's market share in recent times. I believe it was up around 5% or so; nothing to write home about but coming on stronger each day. I think we are easily numbed into forgetting all the bugs, restrictions and security holes in IE, as long as it doesn't "burp" on us. The things like swiss cheese with security though; no matter how many updates and patches they release.FF is a cool toy, but it's not a mainstream browser, and IMO never will be.... and that's a shame.
Even though I've not had one problem with Firefox, security and speed alone would still make me much more tolerant of any that showed.
5% of the market isn't coming close to being considered mainstream
Originally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: Buz2b
(('m starting to sound like a traveling Mozilla salesman but I'm not) I would respectfully dissagree with your assumption that Firefox is not a mainstream browser. Recent story on the news that Firefox has gained steadily on IE's market share in recent times. I believe it was up around 5% or so; nothing to write home about but coming on stronger each day. I think we are easily numbed into forgetting all the bugs, restrictions and security holes in IE, as long as it doesn't "burp" on us. The things like swiss cheese with security though; no matter how many updates and patches they release.FF is a cool toy, but it's not a mainstream browser, and IMO never will be.... and that's a shame.
Even though I've not had one problem with Firefox, security and speed alone would still make me much more tolerant of any that showed.
5% of the market isn't coming close to being considered mainstream. He is right. And every browser has security patches, even firefox.
Yet, that OS only has a 1.3% worldwide share,
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
i swear beta was more stable then 1.0.
Originally posted by: sparkyclarky
Firefox crashes on me occasionally with Java, and almost always when I view sites that have embedded .wmv files. It's really annoying, and I haven't heard of any solutions for it.
I agree with your point about the server market, I was trying to keep the apples to apples in the "discussion" though, and point out the lunacy of saying 5% isn't indicitive of mainstream penetration in the browser market. I think MS is in deep doo-doo in the server area and it's a matter of time before the same kind of numbers start cropping up in the OS marketplace. That's probably why they are taking much longer than anticipated to finish Longhorn; they really can't afford another embarrasment full of security holes.Originally posted by: Nothinman
Yet, that OS only has a 1.3% worldwide share,
I think that number is low, Linux has stolen a huge portion of the server marketplace around the world. That article you linked to says that Linux takes up 28% of the worldwide server shipments.
And desktop penetration in the US is pretty low because MS is a US company and our government essentially promotes them pretty well. But the rest of the world is looking for alternatives and they usually come to Linux, some because they can't afford the prices MS charges, even with the special deals they give to avoid Linux usage, and some because they don't want to be dependent on a US company and even some because they feel government software should be OSS. It's impossible to accurately gauge Linux penetration because it's free, one person could download it and install it on 1 machine or a thousand and you couldn't tell the difference.