JESUS FUCKING CHRIST, IT'S SPELLED :
VIOLA
capcapcapcpapcpacpapcapcpapcapcpaca
Chrome sacrifices rendering things wonky at first for a few milliseconds of perceived loading speed. IIRC FF has about:config setting that can do the same.
I will not use Chrome until they come up with a way to disable those ghetto site icons that litter the UI like browser.chrome.favicons=false does. I wrote a Chrome extension to try and do it but their extension APIs are ineffective in blocking the icons. I even blocked http[s?]://*.ico on a proxy and Chrome still was able to render the Google and Gmail site icons. I fucking despise those things.
Hmm....if you run http://html5test.com/ it comes out with a 17& higher score than Firefox 4.
Opera would be perfect if it had support for Netflix Instant.opera is better then both not sure why you guys are arguing about who is #2
So now there's at least 5 of us?!?![]()
Opera would be perfect if it had support for Netflix Instant.
but I'd rather use Firefox than have to switch between Opera/IE
adblock plus
No, what's been covered is your opinion, as espoused in the current thread in the Software for Windows forum, which I simply don't agree with. ABP does not work as well in Chrome as it does in Firefox.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhgt8AC5qBE
This is why Chrome sucks compared to Firefox.
It'll play private YouTube videos?
When I first started using chrome a couple years ago the blocked ad's did load initially and then turn invisible. This however has not been the case for at least a year.
That's where you're wrong. That video was made March 6th, 2010 with the latest version of Chrome and whatever adblocker. I'm never going back to Chrome because I know it still will happen. It's how fucking Chrome works. Google will not ever have shit blocked before it loads. It would be against their revenue model.
Actually, that's where you're wrong. This is the adblock I use: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom .
And with this adblock, the ad's are not initially displayed and then turned invisible when the page finishes loading. Now whether or not the ad's are still being loaded behind the scenes may be a different story, but this doesn't change the fact that they are not loaded in the manner listed in your video. WTF do I care if google makes money if the ad's are loaded in the background.
Less than 1% of the web is HTML so 17% on a synthetic HTML5 benchmark is not enough to get me to switch.
What are you saying the other 99% is? Or did you leave off the 5 in that post?
Chrome >>> Firefox
It deals with retarded Flash updates all on its own.
Actually, that's where you're wrong. This is the adblock I use: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom .
And with this adblock, the ad's are not initially displayed and then turned invisible when the page finishes loading. Now whether or not the ad's are still being loaded behind the scenes may be a different story, but this doesn't change the fact that they are not loaded in the manner listed in your video. WTF do I care if google makes money if the ad's are loaded in the background.
I used MORE THAN ONE. I tried many. I used the ones suggested and ones not suggested. They all did it.
And the problem with that shit loading is that they can track what you do all over the internet and eventually link you to all kinds of shit. Distorting a lot of things.