Info Firefox 82 Released

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Sort by date Sort by votes
VirtualLarry

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,587
10,225
126
Wow, after installing it (very quick, on my PC), it popped up a page for "Mozilla VPN". That actually sounds interesting. Albeit, it looks like a paid option. (Maybe they're not operating the service themselves, but sub-contracting it out to one of the existing VPN companies? Does anyone know?)
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Steltek

Steltek

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2001
3,352
1,090
136
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
balloonshark

balloonshark

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2008
7,158
3,625
136
Chiefcrowe said:
Better late than never -

Firefox 'Site Isolation' feature enters user testing, expected next year

www.zdnet.com

Firefox 'Site Isolation' feature enters user testing, expected next year | ZDNet

Users can test Firefox Site Isolation in Nightly builds.
www.zdnet.com www.zdnet.com
Click to expand...
I'm guessing the multi-account containers add-on will still be useful since there is little chance google would develop security that would render their cookies useless.

When this feature comes out a website on my PC will be isolated with this new feature, sandboxed through firefox, stuck in multi-account container and sandboxed with Sandboxie. I believe in layering your security but this seems a bit overkill or over complicated. As long as it works and I still have enough RAM to do what I want I welcome the security and privacy upgrades.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Chiefcrowe

Chiefcrowe

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2008
5,056
199
116
That sounds good to me. Good poing about multi account containers and google.

Do you ever browse in VMs? I think that is a good way to keep things siloed for banking etc.

Different browsers for different social media, etc. is probably a good strategy also. You can install the Firefox Dev edition along side normal Firefox and run both simultaneously.


balloonshark said:
I'm guessing the multi-account containers add-on will still be useful since there is little chance google would develop security that would render their cookies useless.

When this feature comes out a website on my PC will be isolated with this new feature, sandboxed through firefox, stuck in multi-account container and sandboxed with Sandboxie. I believe in layering your security but this seems a bit overkill or over complicated. As long as it works and I still have enough RAM to do what I want I welcome the security and privacy upgrades.
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
balloonshark

balloonshark

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2008
7,158
3,625
136
Chiefcrowe said:
That sounds good to me. Good poing about multi account containers and google.

Do you ever browse in VMs? I think that is a good way to keep things siloed for banking etc.

Different browsers for different social media, etc. is probably a good strategy also. You can install the Firefox Dev edition along side normal Firefox and run both simultaneously.
Click to expand...
I only played a around a little bit with full VMs in the past. I still use a light VM (Shadow Defender) for when I'm knowingly surfing sketchy sites. It only virtualizes your currect OS drive and other drives you choose. You can turn it on any time and off with a reboot or off by shutting down.

I used to use a clean Sandboxied browser session to shop, bank, etc. but it got to be a pain. I've come to rely on multi-account containers to take up the slack.

I do think using different browsers is an excellent idea. Even better since it could run within a separate Sandboxie sandbox to keep it isolated.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Chiefcrowe

Chiefcrowe

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2008
5,056
199
116
I find that it is very handy to keep several browsers installed on my main PC to keep sites isolated from each other especially banking or social media. I know that a VM is a bit more hassle but would be very good too, since you can always suspend or put them to sleep when not in use. Shadow defender sounds intriguing!

I think you can probably have all of these installed side by side: normal Firefox, Firefox DEV edition, Firefox Nightly, FF Portable, plus other 3rd party browsers. With Sandboxie that is even a better proposal.

Application Guard works with Edge, and also would be a good solution if you use that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: balloonshark
Upvote 0 Downvote
BarkingGhostar

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,410
1,617
136
I still cannot get FF to play 4K videos on YT. Chrome works fine, but FF does not. I've enabled the webm (vp() codec in the browser but it still won't do it. This is all on Linux Mint, by the way.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
R

RLGL

Platinum Member
Jan 8, 2013
2,115
322
126
BarkingGhostar said:
I still cannot get FF to play 4K videos on YT. Chrome works fine, but FF does not. I've enabled the webm (vp() codec in the browser but it still won't do it. This is all on Linux Mint, by the way.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I got tired of FF not functioning on several websites. Tried Edge, at least the sites that were not functioning work. I found an ext. to put the favs in the side. I am happy ... for the minute.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
BarkingGhostar

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,410
1,617
136
Strangely enough I loaded up LM20 Groovy Gorilla on another box that only differed in processor (i5 vs. i7) and used IGP instead of dedicated video card. FF worked perfectly and offered high resolutions to videos on YT. I'm guessing there must be something wrong with the 18.4 of LM I am using on my main PC. Time for an upgrade.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom